Fly Rods Question - Fly Fishing Forum
Worldwide Flyfishing Discussion Talk flyfishing with members around the world!

View Poll Results: Are brand name rods worth the additional cost?
Yes, without a doubt, they catch more fish. 0 0%
Yes, they outperform the "standard" rod. 3 12.00%
Yes, for the right angler who knows how to use them, a definite advantage. 13 52.00%
No, no difference except for the warranty. 5 20.00%
No, no difference at all. 1 4.00%
Why are you asking? 3 12.00%
It makes me feel good that I have paid top dollar for the top of the line. 0 0%
Paying alot makes my fishing buddies jealous. 0 0%
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-25-2003, 09:49 PM
andrew andrew is offline
Recent Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Farmington River, Connecticut
Posts: 24
Fly Rods Question

Question and Poll item - are brand name fly rods (and we know what they are) that cost several hundred dollars anymore effective or long-lasting than a more in-expensive rod, say under $150 from a catalog supplier without the marquee name.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old 02-25-2003, 11:22 PM
flytyer flytyer is offline
Pullin' Thread
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Washington
Posts: 3,346
For the angler who knows how to use them, the added performance of the top rods are a definite advantage. That said, however, it is only the angler who knows how to cast a long line consistently, how to control the long line when fishing, etc. who will benefit from the added performance of the top line rods. All others will do as well with a mid priced rod as the expensive ones.

I never buy a rod on the basis of the name, I buy them on the basis of will it do what I want it to do. I then make my purchase after I find the rod(s) that will do what I want it to do. Unfortunately, I have not found anything but the high end, top quality rods to satisfy the requirements I have for a rod for well over 25 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3  
Old 02-25-2003, 11:45 PM
DEERHAAWK DEERHAAWK is offline
Active Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: EAST/WEST OREGON
Posts: 498
RODS

Good evening,
Different rod's have subtle changes in action. With that said, the fish do NOT care what you hold in your hand. It is not the fishing rod that catches the fish, but the fisherman, or woman who has the unique ability to "present" the bait in a way that atracts that fish. Forgive me for being redundant, but you could scotch-tape a piece of your mom's clothes line to a 2x4, and as long as your presentation is "on", you will catch fish.
Do I hear the sound of squirming?
Deerhawk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4  
Old 02-26-2003, 04:58 AM
FishHawk FishHawk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,039
I feel for the most part rods are overpriced. However, from the_manufactures point of view he has to charge enough to make a good profit. For saltwater, once you buy your 9 or 9wt rod that's all you need. So every year there is the latest and greatest rod you have to own. Some of the top manufactures discontinue great rods so that you'll buy the new one. That being said I look for a good rod that is backed up by great service. I also build my rods and save a little money. FishHawk
__________________
FishHawk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5  
Old 02-26-2003, 06:38 AM
flyfisha1's Avatar
flyfisha1 flyfisha1 is offline
Marine Scientist
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC, South Jersey, Eastern PA
Posts: 1,080
I have purchased complete rods as well as blanks under Cabela's name, as well as rods "by Bass Pro Shops" and blanks by Hook and Hackle, all of which were $170 or less. The blanks that I purchased were to build rods that priced out around $300 if bought complete. I have also purchased many "high-end" blanks from Loomis and St. Croix and have built rods that would otherwise have cost $400+ in the stores. Is there a difference in the cheaper rods? Oh yeah. The first glaring difference, in my experience, is that the action of the cheaper rods has been consistently slower than that of the "premium" rods, and I'm comparing blanks that have roughly the same modulus and are sold as being the same action (i.e. fast, moderate/fast, etc.). Take the cheap fast action rod or blank and compare it to the more expensive blank; it can't be done. It's like comparing a fast action blank with a moderate/fast action, there's that much difference. Now, it's true that anyone can pick up a new fly rod and, with time, learn to cast a considerable amount of line fairly accurately, so the matter of action becomes somewhat secondary to those not caring if they need to make some major adjustments to their casting styles to accomodate a slower rod. However, for those of us that are constantly facing windy conditions AND dont want to spend several days or weeks getting the hang of such a rod, the faster action, more expensive blank or rod is the way to go. Again, if you want a premium rod at a modest price, build the rod from scratch or get someone to do it for you. I can give you the name and contact info of a guy that has built a very nice 9-wt. for me using a Loomis IMX blank, and it cost around $180. This is with all aluminum and TiCH hardware.
And unless you're dead-drifting to blind, deaf, and otherwise senseless fish, I think you might want to leave the 2x4 in the shed.:hehe:
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6  
Old 02-26-2003, 07:05 AM
BobK BobK is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lake Ontario Tribs
Posts: 871
My 2 cents....

For the guy who knows how to use 'em AND needs the advantages of distance, etc. there IS a difference. That said, however, with the methods I use and the streams I fish, and the abuse I subject the rods to in hard use, there is little advantage in using an expensive rod FOR ME!

I was taught to approach fish (or "fishy" spots) from below, and to carefully stalk as close as possible before making ONE GOOD CAST! Minimal line to mend, and that first cast will take a fish if he is feeding or aggressive.

I have seen guys make "flawless" casts from long distances, but drag or micro-drag screws up "that perfect presentation". Many of these guys are buddies of mine, yet they are the first to admit that I take more fish than they do.

Yes, I can cast "pretty" on a casting pond. But when fishing, I use unorthodox casts, to match the conditions.

I guess what I am saying is I think that technique, not brand name, catches more fish. That said, I do own a couple of "high end" rods - they don't see much use, though, as I tend to use my less expensive rods, as I know they may get beat up just getting in to some of the spots I fish.

BobK
__________________
BobK
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7  
Old 02-26-2003, 08:48 AM
Eddie Eddie is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Portland, ME.
Posts: 1,586
Rods don't catch fish but..

Are the nice ones any more effective, durable, nicer to look at, warrentied, fun to cast? Of course. Are they worth it? Many people obviously think so.
I was in a shop while a guy was buying an Abel reel. Another "customer" puts in his two cents,"A Ross reel will do everything that that Abel will, and just as well." (thanks for the help Dude)
The owner of the store asks the helpful guy, "OK., say an Abel and a Ross cost the same. Which reel are you going to choose?"
"Well if you put it that way, the Abel."
I think you could say the same for the rods.
__________________
One cast can change your day...maybe your life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #8  
Old 02-26-2003, 09:15 AM
BigDave BigDave is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: northeast salt chuck
Posts: 1,401
If you spend a lot of time on the water, eventually you are going to break a rod or 2 and a quality warranty pays for itself the first time you use it. I broke 2 rods over the last couple of years and couldn't be more pleased with the service of the "high-end" rod manufacturers. I take decent care with my equipment however...if you're the kind of person who throws their rod around you're probably wasting your money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Fly Fishing Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New England Gear Set-Up question - which size rods to own? GreenSailMan Gear Talk - Fly Stuff Spoken Here 5 03-30-2010 08:33 AM
Two-handed Rods - Length Question Sean Juan the Rod Rack 4 10-10-2006 09:48 PM
Question on 2 hand rods and lines??? capt_gordon Art of Casting 4 04-07-2005 10:35 AM
Birdie Fly Rods have a few good bamboo rods on sale! birdie For Sale by Owner 0 10-07-2001 10:21 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:50 AM.



Copyright Flyfishingforum.com (All Rights Reserved)