ettiquette - Part II - Fly Fishing Forum
Pacific Northwest Sea Run Forum No such thing as rainbow trout, only landlocked steelhead

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-19-2002, 08:31 AM
juro's Avatar
juro juro is offline
Coast2coast Flyfishaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Steelhead country|striper coast|bonefish belt
Posts: 20,585
ettiquette - Part II

(that thread was getting l-o-n-g)

OK -

Let's discuss lo-holing. First is the classic lo-hole:

You are fishing a hole (needs definition) that is not big enough for two (needs definition). Someone cuts in front of you and stops your progression.

In this case let's assume that a spot separated by rapids on top and bottom is a pool. Is that acceptable to all?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	lohole.jpg
Views:	225
Size:	7.8 KB
ID:	943  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old 10-19-2002, 08:33 AM
juro's Avatar
juro juro is offline
Coast2coast Flyfishaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Steelhead country|striper coast|bonefish belt
Posts: 20,585
Then there is the approach we recommend, following thru.

Someone is fishing a hole that is not big enough for two (definition required). The second angler walks to the top of the pool, waits until the other angler has reached a reasonable distance thru the run (which requires definition) over a reasonable period of time (which requires def), then enters the top of the pool.

Proposals:

Reasonable distance - 200 feet, or the length of both working lines added together to space the anglers apart

Reasonable time - not more than ten casts without moving a rod length, take them all at once and walk -or- take them a step at a time, same difference.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	follow.jpg
Views:	227
Size:	8.0 KB
ID:	944  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3  
Old 10-19-2002, 08:37 AM
juro's Avatar
juro juro is offline
Coast2coast Flyfishaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Steelhead country|striper coast|bonefish belt
Posts: 20,585
Another case is the next or previous pool advance. If we accept that a pool is bound by rapids, then the arriving angler could choose to fish the pool above or below the current pool without any grief. Opinions?

In this case, we show the angler going to the next pool down...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	nextdown.jpg
Views:	227
Size:	8.0 KB
ID:	945  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4  
Old 10-19-2002, 08:38 AM
juro's Avatar
juro juro is offline
Coast2coast Flyfishaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Steelhead country|striper coast|bonefish belt
Posts: 20,585
Then there's the other bank. Assuming the river is wide enough for two people on opposite sides (needs definition of how wide) would an opposite side advance constitute lo-holing?

This is a bad example because the river is so narrow between banks. What would an acceptable width be? How about so the swings don't touch at 45 degree angles to each other standing directly opposite each other or something?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	loholeother.jpg
Views:	210
Size:	7.7 KB
ID:	946  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5  
Old 10-19-2002, 08:47 AM
juro's Avatar
juro juro is offline
Coast2coast Flyfishaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Steelhead country|striper coast|bonefish belt
Posts: 20,585
And how about this, if the person feels you should accept his intrusion, then he must think it's OK or not know better, so simply walk around to the part you wanted to fish just as he did.

Sounds crazy, but it is indeed fully balanced on both sides of the fence. Is it two wrongs not making a right? Is a verbal (or worse) confrontation worse or better than sending this silent message?

Keep in mind the offender has no defendable stance in this. interesting anyway.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	revenge.jpg
Views:	204
Size:	8.4 KB
ID:	947  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6  
Old 10-19-2002, 10:25 AM
Patrick Patrick is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Deschutes River
Posts: 9
Unless the next run downstream is clearly seperated from the occupied run, following through is really the only correct option.

The wildcard in this whole game is the lack of established traditions out West regarding moving through a run (compared to, say, the Margaree in Nova Scotia).

If someone were to approach me and ask to follow me through a run I am fishing, I must say "sure, no problem". It should not even be necessary to ask permission, but out here in the Wild West (I live in Maupin, Oregon on the Deschutes River) people can be pretty territorial regarding the water they are fishing.

This problem reminds me of a non-fishing etiquette issue I've encountered while driving. When road construction forces cars to merge into one lane, big city drivers know to alternate every other car. When the same scene plays out in a smaller town drivers hesitate to merge, or kind of jumble together a couple cars at a time, because they encounter major road construction less frequently.

Traditions take time to establish. I wish we could speed up the process.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7  
Old 10-19-2002, 11:16 AM
Willie Gunn's Avatar
Willie Gunn Willie Gunn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Spey, Deveron.Brora, Ness, Connon, Beauly
Posts: 1,096
Juro et al.
The Scots are a clever lot and we have solved these problems long ago.

By charging you can restrict the numbers of anglers wishing to fish a particular piece of water. Private beats are expensive but you know that you are paying for exclusivity. At Tulcan for example the estate owns both banks of the river so when you are given your pool / hole for the session you know no one else will bother you. On single bank water the rule is you “always” come in behind the angler already fishing unless waved in by that angler. Even if your lines do not cross it is always polite to wait till you are waved in.

Most rivers have Association waters, which are more heavily fished but are cheaper. The season ticket on the River Ness at Inverness costs about $120 a season January to mid October. Because of the pressure on these fishings the association writes rules and you can be asked to leave the association if you break the rules. I quote the rules here. Rules 1-3 are about where the fishing is and carrying your membership card etc.

4. The angler arriving first at either side of a beat will have first
turn of fishing, and others will follow in order of their arrival.

5. Anglers will commence fishing at a beat post and must move
down 2 yards at every cast until either terminating fishing or
reaching the next beat post,. where should another angler be waiting
that angler must be given priority.

6. When an angler has moved down 30 yards the next angler in
order of arrival will follow, otherwise he will lose his turn and take
the next place.

7. At dawn the angler who has first turn will begin when it
becomes just light enough for him to see his fly or another lure,
otherwise he will lose his turn and take next place.

8. An angler ready to begin to fish, and waiting at a beat post,
when a space is vacant will take precedence over another angler who
has the place before him, but who is not ready. An angler will not
commence fishing at a beat post if an upstream angler is within 30
yards of that post. He must wait until that angler reaches the post.

9. An angler after landing a salmon or grilse will not continue
fishing but will take his place after those waiting, but if he loses a
fish he may continue.

To help things the pool/ hole is split, subdivided into beats marked with white posts these beats are about 100 yards long. When the Ness was fishing well and there were a lot of fish coming into the pool of the tide you might have to get down to the river earlier than you wished so you were in pole position towards the tail of the pool as the fish came in. Catch your fish the scamper back to the head of the pool to go down again. Rule 7 was always interesting large white flies would be attached so you could get in first then after a couple of casts change back to the fly you wanted to fish with. Bear in mind there could be fifteen anglers a side moving down the pool all throwing 30yds of double tapered line timing was critical and heaven help you if you did not move down or cast across the angler’s line on the other bank

I get quite nostalgic thinking about it as this is where I learnt to fish as a boy of twelve. Everyone wore chest waders and waded up to their waists’ minimum I was only allowed thigh boots by my mother who then wondered why my trousers were always wet. At least I learnt to cast that little bit extra to get my fly as far out as everyone else My father was left handed so we always went down the right hand bank so that is the way I learnt to Spey cast it was not till I learnt to drive that I discovered how much easier it was to cast off the other shoulder. Sorry to to go off topic.

Malcolm
__________________
Willie Gunn
Quot homines tot sententiae

www.speygillie.co.uk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #8  
Old 10-19-2002, 11:40 AM
MJC's Avatar
MJC MJC is offline
Junkyard Spey
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Clearwater River, Peck, ID
Posts: 887
Mr. Gunn

Malcom, I really enjoyed your little trip down memory lane. Thanks for posting it. Thanks also for sharing some more info on how things are done in other parts of the world angling wise. I don't think I would like to see that system here as I like to run down to the river for a couple of hours whenever the mood strikes me. I would really like to visit Scotland someday and see the great rivers you guys have and watch your system in action.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #9  
Old 10-19-2002, 12:28 PM
juro's Avatar
juro juro is offline
Coast2coast Flyfishaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Steelhead country|striper coast|bonefish belt
Posts: 20,585
Enjoyable reading indeed, but we're getting way off track.

Q1: Who decides when a pool is big enough to divide into seperate beats? Isn't this in fact low-holing by committee?

Q2: Patrick, doesn't a set of rapids (as shown and described) clearly separate the run? Therefore is it acceptable or not?

Q3: My suggested pace was half of what Willie mentioned, yet the distance is 200 verses 90 feet. I feel 3 feet per cast is a little fast, and 90 feet is too tight for me.

Q4: Any feedback on the rights to the other side question? Clearly the angler is fishing primarily on his bank on any river large enough to fish both sides. On any river not wide enough, the same-side rules should apply. Thouhgts?

No word on the "do unto others" reaction yet either...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #10  
Old 10-19-2002, 01:26 PM
MJC's Avatar
MJC MJC is offline
Junkyard Spey
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Clearwater River, Peck, ID
Posts: 887
Do Unto Others

Juro, I think this rule should be at the top of everyone's list. Treat every other angler as you would be treated. That rule and a little common sense should be all anyone needs for guidance. On rivers where there is a river keeper they enforce rules designed for that specific stretch of water. In our country where we have mostly public water a specific set of rules will not work very good. To me your questions and drawings clearly point this out. Who is to decide. One man's perfect fishing area may not suit next guy. As long as we have public water (which I hope is forever) I can see no set of rules except the Golden rule and a little common sense that will work in all situations. Any Boyscout can grasp this concept. The only people that don't "get it" don't care anyway and no one short of a fish cop with a big stick and handcuffs will be able to do anything with them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #11  
Old 10-19-2002, 01:28 PM
Willie Gunn's Avatar
Willie Gunn Willie Gunn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Spey, Deveron.Brora, Ness, Connon, Beauly
Posts: 1,096
Sorry Juro

I'll be concise this time.

Q1: Who decides when a pool is big enough to divide into seperate beats? Isn't this in fact low-holing by committee?
Yes you're right but at least you know it's going to happen and it is neccessary if the water is under severe angling pressure. If you don't have beat markers someone might have to wait an awful long time to fish a pool.
Q2: Patrick, doesn't a set of rapids (as shown and described) clearly separate the run? Therefore is it acceptable or not?
Q2 Yes perfectly acceptable to me anyway.
Q3: My suggested pace was half of what Willie mentioned, yet the distance is 200 verses 90 feet. I feel 3 feet per cast is a little fast, and 90 feet is too tight for me.
Q3Again it depeds on pressure of anglers 200ft is a long way apart, I always take 3ft per cast perhaps a difference of Atlantic Salmon to Steelhead ?
Q4 Yes both fishing same water so same rules apply.
And finally Two wrongs don't make a right.
__________________
Willie Gunn
Quot homines tot sententiae

www.speygillie.co.uk

Last edited by Willie Gunn; 10-19-2002 at 01:30 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #12  
Old 10-19-2002, 05:40 PM
pmflyfisher's Avatar
pmflyfisher pmflyfisher is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Upper Mid West - Great Lakes Tributaries
Posts: 3,165
Malcolm

Good post I am going to have to find a job in Scotland, I am 20% Irish will that help?

I like the European order and rules something I am afraid us spoiled U.S. anglers will never be able to accept. The only thing that has saved us so far is our supposedly unlimited natural resources, but that will be coming to an end soon including the fisheries if proper controls and order are not adopted.

Hal
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #13  
Old 10-19-2002, 06:31 PM
Patrick Patrick is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Deschutes River
Posts: 9
regarding rapids

Juro, it would not bother me if someone entered the next pool/run below me as depicted in your diagram. I could then follow him through that run, go up and fish through my run again or find another piece of water.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #14  
Old 10-20-2002, 01:29 AM
SparseHairHackl SparseHairHackl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 171
Regarding speed of movement (steelhead)--
Three feet per cast is as slow as I would ever go, unless I have moved a fish. I was taught 2 big steps between casts, and I have come to the conclusion after many years that is about right for my fishing. I'll go even faster if I am unsure of the quality of the run, somewhat slower if I am sure of the situation, and I'll pause if I move a fish. I am speaking of summer fishing, where the fish are active and one is looking for the aggressive fish. I haven't done any winter fishing lately; most of my winter fishing in past years was drift fishing, and I moved then, too, but not as quickly, which makes sense since the fish aren't as active.

In the summer, if you figure that the fish is typically moving up through the water column 4 feet or so (3 to 6 feet being typical) if you're fishing a floating line, then moving 6 feet between casts means that the farthest a cast would ever pass from the fish would be 3 feet. If a fish will move up 4 feet to grab the fly, I figure it will move 3 feet upcurrent or down if needed.

Getting a bit off-topic...
Regarding the low-holing--I posted on how I got low-holed on the Umpqua last month. On the Umpqua, where so many of the holes are named, you can always fish the next hole up or down without violating the ethical standard. However, you cannot jump into the same hole downstream of someone, regardless of the size of the hole. I questioned where I was jumped--it was a long pool (Bend Pool), but someone with much more time on that river than I confirmed I was unethically low-holed.

Regarding fishing the same hole from the other side, I think if the river is, say, about 200 feet across or more, it is OK. I think the 45 degree cast is too close a call--some places fish OK with a 90 degree cast. If the river is 200 feet wide, two anglers making 100 foot casts won't bother each other from opposite sides. I might settle for 150 feet, since I'm not a great caster<g>, which comes pretty close to casting 100 feet at 45 degrees (<142 feet if I can still do math).

I concur that a rapids signifies a break between holes, and it is probably OK to fish the next hole below a rapids or significant break, but this ethic may be region or country-specific, and one should learn the local rules.

I certainly concur that we should all consider the Golden Rule in our actions. However, I would like to have, perhaps, 3 holes in succession to fish, figuring typically 30 minutes per hole on average (N. Umpqua), so that I can fish for a bit before popping in the car in search of the next open spot. However, I will seldom find 3 holes together in succession, so if I act per the Golden Rule, leaving others 3 holes, I will never get to fish myself. Hence the local rule of each fisher gets a hole to him/herself. After the one, you get to find another.

Nice thread...I hope we can make progress on this...I fish good runs less and less as time goes by, or at less productive times, because I hate being crowded, or even worrying about crowding others. I don't get too competitive at finding a place to fish, either. I don't mind getting there at dawn, but getting there 2 hours before dawn to reserve a spot? Never.

My time on the river needs to be time away from competition...the sound of the water, the shriek of the Kingfisher, the color of the Vine Maple this time of year, the beauty of the White Egret...those are what I seek while waiting for the grab...

--Bill
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #15  
Old 10-20-2002, 02:08 AM
flytyer flytyer is offline
Pullin' Thread
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Washington
Posts: 3,346
Juro,

No doubt in my mind that a set of rapids or a riffle makes the sepeartion beween pools.

A reasonable width of river to share the same pool/run on opposite sides I put at 120 ft. if both fishers fish in the manner Malcolm described. I have done this on several ocasion on the Olympic Peninsula, and all was fine. Keep in mind that each bank is shoeing the fly lure in a different fashion from the other.

Perfectly acceptable for a fisherman to go below and fish the next pool/run downstream. This is not low-holing because it is a different pool/run.

In summer I usually move about 4-6 feet between casts, unless I had a pluck or boil, then I will throw another cast or two to see if the fish will come another time. In winter, I move about 2-3 feet between casts.

Jumping below the fellow who low-holed you is wrong. As Malcolm said, "Two wrongs don't make a right". I will, however, fish right down to his heels as I fish my way down the pool/run.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Fly Fishing Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Part 2 OC Pacific Northwest Sea Run Forum 3 03-08-2011 08:17 AM
FLATS ETTIQUETTE juro Stripers and Coastal Gamefish 42 07-11-2006 05:08 AM
Farmington River, Crowds, Ettiquette, Divine Intervention FrankF The Quintessential Trout 1 05-09-2006 08:33 AM
Flats Fishing Ettiquette- wading vs. boating MarkNY Stripers and Coastal Gamefish 2 05-27-2003 07:09 AM
Rhody Part II JimW Stripers and Coastal Gamefish 18 10-03-2002 05:41 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:57 PM.



Copyright Flyfishingforum.com (All Rights Reserved)