"The beggining of the end?" Posted without comment. - Fly Fishing Forum
Worldwide Flyfishing Discussion Talk flyfishing with members around the world!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-26-2002, 11:34 PM
fredaevans fredaevans is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rogue River
Posts: 3,856
"The beggining of the end?" Posted without comment.

By DAVID KRAVETS
.c The Associated Press

SAN FRANCISCO (June 26) - Stunning politicians on both the left and right, a federal appeals court declared for the first time Wednesday that reciting the Pledge of Allegiance in public schools is unconstitutional because of the words ''under God'' inserted by Congress in 1954.

The ruling, if allowed to stand, would mean schoolchildren could no longer recite the pledge, at least in the nine Western states covered by the court.

Critics of the decision were flabbergasted and warned that it calls into question the use of ''In God We Trust'' on the nation's currency, the public singing of patriotic songs like ''God Bless America,'' even the use of the phrase ''So help me God'' when judges are sworn into office.

The case was brought by a California man who objected to his daughter being compelled to listen to her second-grade classmates recite the pledge.

In a 2-1 decision, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the phrase ''one nation under God'' amounts to a government endorsement of religion in violation of the separation of church and state.

Leading schoolchildren in a pledge that says the United States is ''one nation under God'' is as objectionable as making them say ''we are a nation 'under Jesus,' a nation 'under Vishnu,' a nation 'under Zeus,' or a nation 'under no god,' because none of these professions can be neutral with respect to religion,'' Circuit Judge Alfred T. Goodwin wrote.

In Canada, where President Bush was taking part in an economic summit, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said: ''The president's reaction was that this ruling is ridiculous.''

''The Supreme Court itself begins each of its sessions with the phrase 'God save the United States and this honorable court,''' Fleischer said. ''The Declaration of Independence refers to God or to the creator four different times. Congress begins each session of the Congress each day with a prayer, and of course our currency says, 'In God We Trust.' The view of the White House is that this was a wrong decision and the Department Justice is now evaluating how to seek redress.''

The ruling was also attacked on Capitol Hill, with Senate Majority Leader Thomas Daschle, D-S.D., calling it ''just nuts.''

After the ruling, House members gathered on the front steps of the Capitol to recite the pledge en masse - the same place they defiantly sang ''God Bless America'' the night of the Sept. 11 attacks.

And senators, who were debating a defense bill, angrily stopped to unanimously pass a resolution denouncing the decision.

The government had argued that the religious content of ''one nation under God'' is minimal. But the appeals court said that an atheist or a holder of certain non-Judeo-Christian beliefs could see it as an endorsement of monotheism.

The 9th Circuit covers Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington state. Those are the only states directly affected by the ruling.

However, the ruling does not take effect for several months, to allow further appeals. The government can ask the court to reconsider, or take its case to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Congress inserted ''under God'' at the height of the Cold War after a campaign by the Knights of Columbus, religious leaders and others who wanted to distinguish the United States from what they regarded as godless communism.

Michael A. Newdow, a Sacramento atheist, sued his daughter's Elk Grove school district, Congress and then-President Clinton in 2000, calling the pledge a ''religious idea that certain people don't agree with.'' A federal judge had dismissed his lawsuit.

Newdow, a doctor who holds a law degree and represented himself, said Wednesday he was trying to restore the pledge to its pre-1954 version, saying no one should be forced to worship a religion in which they don't believe.

''Many people who are upset about this are people who just don't understand,'' he said. ''People have to consider what if they were in the minority religion and the majority religion was overpowering them.''

The appeals court said that when President Eisenhower signed the legislation inserting ''under God'' after the words ''one nation,'' he declared: ''Millions of our schoolchildren will daily proclaim in every city and town, every village and rural schoolhouse, the dedication of our nation and our people to the Almighty.''

The appeals court noted that the U.S. Supreme Court has said students cannot be compelled to recite the pledge. But even when the pledge is voluntary, ''the school district is nonetheless conveying a message of state endorsement of a religious belief when it requires public school teachers to recite, and lead the recitation of, the current form of the pledge.''

The ruling was issued by Goodwin, who was appointed by President Nixon, and Circuit Judge Stephen Reinhardt, a Carter appointee.

In a dissent, Circuit Judge Ferdinand F. Fernandez, appointed by the first President Bush, warned that under his colleagues' theory of the Constitution, ''we will soon find ourselves prohibited from using our album of patriotic songs in many public settings.''

'''God Bless America' and 'America the Beautiful' will be gone for sure,'' he said, ''and while use of the first and second stanzas of the 'Star-Spangled Banner' will still be permissible, we will be precluded from straying into the third.''

Fernandez said the same faulty logic would apply to ''In God We Trust'' on the nation's currency.

Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo., was one of many lawmakers who immediately reacted in anger and shock to the ruling.

''Our Founding Fathers must be spinning in their graves. This is the worst kind of political correctness run amok,'' Bond said. ''What's next? Will the courts now strip 'so help me God' from the pledge taken by new presidents?''

Harvard scholar Laurence Tribe predicted the U.S. Supreme Court will certainly reverse the decision unless the 9th Circuit reverses itself. ''I would bet an awful lot on that,'' Tribe said.

The 9th Circuit is the nation's most overturned appellate court - partly because it is the largest, but also because it tends to make liberal, activist opinions, and because the cases it hears - on a range of issues from environmental laws to property rights to civil rights - tend to challenge the status quo.

The nation's high court has never squarely addressed the issue, Tribe said. The court has said schools can require teachers to lead the pledge but ruled students cannot be punished for refusing to recite it.

In other school-related religious cases, the high court has said that schools cannot post the Ten Commandments in public school classrooms.

And in March, a federal appeals court ruled that Ohio's motto, ''With God, all things are possible,'' is constitutional and is not an endorsement of Christianity even though it quotes the words of Jesus.

AP-NY-06-26-02 2142EDT

Copyright 2002 The Associated Press
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old 06-26-2002, 11:37 PM
pmflyfisher's Avatar
pmflyfisher pmflyfisher is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Upper Mid West - Great Lakes Tributaries
Posts: 3,165
Jay Leno just told a joke about this.

World Com picnic has just been cancelled also.

Great world we have eh.........
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3  
Old 06-27-2002, 12:56 AM
NrthFrk16's Avatar
NrthFrk16 NrthFrk16 is offline
Mod
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: NF Stilliguamish
Posts: 1,687
Send a message via AIM to NrthFrk16
Thank God...

...this was the article that Fred decided to post this evening and not the 'other one'!!!
__________________
Ryan S. Petzold
aka Sparkey and/or Special
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4  
Old 06-27-2002, 09:28 AM
Stone's Avatar
Stone Stone is offline
Here fishy, fishy, fishy!
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 120
Send a message via AIM to Stone Send a message via Yahoo to Stone
There is a much heated debate on this topic...

on another board I read - Go Here to read it.
__________________
Tight lines and sturdy knots,
Stone
"Tying flies to catch fish and fisherman alike!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5  
Old 06-27-2002, 09:33 AM
juro's Avatar
juro juro is offline
Coast2coast Flyfishaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Steelhead country|striper coast|bonefish belt
Posts: 20,593
Ironically, the markets are up. Unemployment is down over the past month... there must be some bargain hunting going on; this is when the rich get rich. My guess - just another point in the ever-changing cycle.

Here at my day job, at lycos.com - we are as busy as the proverbial billygoat!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6  
Old 06-27-2002, 06:16 PM
striblue's Avatar
striblue striblue is offline
President of CAC
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Plymouth and Chatham, MA
Posts: 7,518
The Supreme Court will overrule the 6th circuit on the pledge . Why you ask?..... Because the separation of church and state is focused on religion and orgainized religion... it has nothing to do with the concept of God in general....simple as that .... By the way... I will reserve my rights under the first amendment to say what I want as long as it does not harm anyone .. So, I am politiclly correct to a point... as politically correct as Oliver Wendell Holmes.

Last edited by striblue; 06-27-2002 at 06:20 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7  
Old 06-27-2002, 08:28 PM
Tod D Tod D is offline
Here fishy fishy
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: south shore MA, cape cod
Posts: 395
I'm w/ John: seems like a nonsensical ruling that most likely will get reversed.

Imagine lots of folks will get themselves good and lathered up over this one - liberal judges, moral relativism, lax mores. US seemed to be doing ok though prior to '54 when the phrase was introduced though. Hmmmm...

Flame on...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Fly Fishing Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LaFontain's "Spot-and-Cast" and "Hang-and-Bob" Migs Worldwide Flyfishing Discussion 0 05-25-2005 03:55 PM
13'6" 4 pc 8/9 wt ~ The 13'6" "Mike Kinney Special" up for auction sean Worldwide Flyfishing Discussion 3 12-10-2004 02:05 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:38 PM.



Copyright Flyfishingforum.com (All Rights Reserved)