OpEd LA Times: Tide May Be Turning for Pacific Salmon - Fly Fishing Forum
Our Environment We are stewards of wild places

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-05-2007, 03:10 PM
Eric's Avatar
Eric Eric is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 961
OpEd LA Times: Tide May Be Turning for Pacific Salmon

LA Times, 2-5-07



The tide may be turning for salmon

In the battle over salmon recovery, it's no longer about inconveniencing humans.

By Paul VanDevelder, PAUL VANDEVELDER, author of "Coyote Warrior: One Man, Three Tribes and the Trial That Forged a Nation," is at work on a new book, "Savages and Scoundrels," for Yale University Press.
February 4, 2007



AS THE little hand on the extinction clock for salmon on the West Coast ticks toward zero hour 2017, according to fisheries biologists battle-weary parties in the almost 20-year-old dispute over how to rescue the fish now agree on one thing. With fish counts bumping historic lows, the entire West Coast salmon fishing industry shut down in 2006 to preserve dwindling stocks, and the price of wild salmon soaring to $30 a pound, the human contest over the salmon's survival has reached its endgame.

Since the Snake River coho salmon were declared extinct in the late 1980s, the players in the "salmon wars" have remained remarkably constant. State governments, fisheries biologists, Indian tribes, conservation groups and fishermen have all backed salmon recovery. In addition to generating billions of dollars in revenue in communities from Central California to the Canadian border, salmonids are the coastal ecosystem's "keystone" species on which more than 500 others wolves, bears, chipmunks, otters and fish eagles, to name some depend for their survival. Remove the salmon, say marine biologists, and the whole system collapses.

On the other side of the salmon wars are the hydropower and aluminum industries, commercial irrigators, inland wheat farmers and barge operators, whose livelihoods depend on cheap power, cheap water and cheap transportation made possible by dams on the Columbia, Snake and Klamath rivers. On balance, the latter interests have had the upper hand.

Despite important victories in court for advocates of salmon recovery, fish counts on these rivers have continued to fall. But in June, there were signs that the tide of the battle may be shifting. Setting a deadline of this July, U.S. District Judge James A. Redden gave the federal government one last chance to produce a recovery plan that would meet its legal responsibilities under the Endangered Species Act. Struggling to contain his ire, Redden told reporters that the government's previous three efforts two put forth by the Clinton administration, one by the Bush administration to rescue salmon had been "made sick" by political quarreling. In the 15 years since the National Marine Fisheries Service and the government began writing "biological opinions" that would serve as the scientific foundation of strategies to save the salmon, legislative and judicial squabbling and stalling had brought 13 salmon stocks to the brink of extinction.

Redden ordered the Bonneville Power Administration, the semi-federal agency responsible for generating and distributing hydropower generated in the Columbia River basin, to spill water from five of its dams. At the very least, the spills would help juvenile salmon, otherwise trapped in warm water behind the dams, to reach the sea. A few weeks after the order, the National Marine Fisheries Service, in a last-ditch effort to save the Klamath River salmon, declared the moratorium on all commercial salmon fishing off the coasts of Northern California, Oregon and Washington state.

Power officials, irrigators, barge operators and their Republican allies in Congress raced to microphones with ridiculous predictions of doom for the fish migrating upstream in the fall and gloom for consumers because the forced "drawdowns" would result in $46 million in electricity rate hikes.

As it turned out, the hysteria, whipped up by such politicians as Sens. Larry Craig (R-Idaho) and Gordon Smith (R-Ore.), over Redden's order to release water amounted to silliness. Juvenile fish counts soared in the late summer and fall of 2006, increasing year over year by 40%, and the power agency ended up saving money, thanks to heavy spring runoff.

Nevertheless, Craig, the National Hydropower Assn.'s legislator of the year in 2002, sought to undercut Redden's authority by attaching a provision to a water bill in Congress that would end funding for the federal Fish Passage Center. The center, created by Congress in the 1990s, is the only agency that monitors the fish counts used to assess the welfare of endangered species. Despite protests from salmon-dependent tribes and states, the water bill containing Craig's provision passed. The agency was dismantled. As fish counts "went dark," the Yakima tribe filed suit against the Bonneville Power Administration, whose budget had included the data-collecting agency, to bring back the Fish Passage Center.

A week and a half ago, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Craig's measure "was arbitrary, capricious and contrary to law." The panel of judges ordered the power agency to restore the Fish Passage Center.

Then Wednesday, the Department of the Interior surprised both sides of the salmon wars when it announced that Warren Buffett's Portland-based PacifiCorp, owner of four hydroelectric dams on the Klamath River, would have to install $470 million worth of fish-friendly apparatus as a condition of its license renewal to operate the dams. Because PacifiCorp's only other option is dam removal, estimated to cost $100 million less than the improvements, the decision means that the four dams, in all likelihood, will be destroyed. Short-term, PacifiCorp will lose an estimated $27 million a year in ratepayer receipts. Long-term, a healthy salmon fishery will produce billions of dollars in revenue for coastal communities.

In the Columbia River basin, the last hope for dam defenders is to find a judge willing to remove Redden from the case. But the prospects for that happening are dim because the judge has compiled a record of fairness and restraint on the issue.

When that effort fails, the path to salmon recovery may thus finally be cleared of political debris and legal hurdles. In the basin, which includes the Snake River, Redden is the one man in the country who has the authority to take charge of the rivers' management, and he awaits the White House's final report. If the fourth plan for salmon recovery doesn't measure up, the judge has stated in plain English that he will step into the river and take the fish by the gills. At that point, all options for the Snake River salmon, including the solution recommended by leading fisheries biologists dam removal will be on the table.

Against this backdrop, the battle over salmon recovery has, in one important respect, ceased to be merely about fish counts. For the defenders of the dams, it was a test of man's dominion over natural resources and the logic of the marketplace. For the defenders of the fish, it was a test of our willingness to curb our appetite for a comfort of civilization to ensure the survival of another species. If we can't do this for the salmon, they ask, what species, including ours, can call itself safe?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old 02-05-2007, 07:41 PM
salmo's Avatar
salmo salmo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Colorado,Wyoming,SW Alaska, Europe
Posts: 282
Against this backdrop, the battle over salmon recovery has, in one important respect, ceased to be merely about fish counts. For the defenders of the dams, it was a test of man's dominion over natural resources and the logic of the marketplace. For the defenders of the fish, it was a test of our willingness to curb our appetite for a comfort of civilization to ensure the survival of another species. If we can't do this for the salmon, they ask, what species, including ours, can call itself safe?

There is not even marketplace logic here. Is was well established, that The value of healthy salmon run worth billions in revenue ( commercial and sport fining industry, local lodging, dining etc.) well surpass potential increase in cost of electricity, and other benefit associated with dams presence. Sure ,US Army Corps of Engineers would have to find others task rather then doing useless salmon recovery plan they would like to continue.

The biggest drag to true salmon recovery is right-wing ideology which says the environment, which can by the way be provide very healthy, renewable benefits, have to be rape for profit benefiting few political supporters in Energy Industry, which happen to be in bad with right-wing fraction of Republican Party.

The current political climate is very favorable to press Democrats in Congress , who are more pro-environment, then their counter partners on other side of the aisle to appropriate money for dam removal.
Some dams have already been scheduled for removal in late 1990, but Republican Congress ( in power since 1994 to 2006) has always conveniently forgot to appropriate the money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Fly Fishing Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flies for new Pacific Salmon book Searun Ocean Flyfishing for Salmon 16 11-07-2006 05:39 PM
Pacific Salmon/Steelhead Policy Overview Eric Pacific Northwest Sea Run Forum 2 01-28-2006 11:19 AM
A magazine solely for Pacific Salmon Fly Fishers? derbyshc Ocean Flyfishing for Salmon 8 09-27-2004 09:15 PM
Atlantic vrs. Pacific Salmon mayflyman Classic Atlantic Salmon 17 12-03-2001 10:24 PM
Great site - pacific salmon juro Ocean Flyfishing for Salmon 0 10-03-2001 09:26 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 PM.



Copyright Flyfishingforum.com (All Rights Reserved)