Rudd versus Wulff on Dee -- Help Needed - Fly Fishing Forum
Classic Atlantic Salmon No pursuit rivals salmon rivers, flies & legacy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-29-2006, 06:31 PM
Eric's Avatar
Eric Eric is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 961
Rudd versus Wulff on Dee -- Help Needed

I found the following statement in a prominent FF mag in an article on the negative aspects of Spey casting for salmon (and steelhead):

I paraphrase to avoid copyright infringement, but the gist of the remark was that in a face-to-face "showdown" on the Aberdeenshire Dee, Lee Wulff outfished Donald Rudd (aka Jock Scott) on that river, Mr. Wulff using his preferred six foot rod.

Seems to me that this rod fight at the Cairnton Corral was judged to be pretty much of a draw, since conditions on the river at the time were very poor. I seem to recall that Wulff may have caught a fish and that Rudd didn't, but Wulff did not necessarily "outfish" Rudd nor in any way show the superiority of the single- handed rod and dry fly on the Dee.

Wulff, himself, in _The Atlantic Salmon_, rev. 1983, mentions that he caught several salmon in Scotland on a dry fly, but does not go into any detail.

I've tried unsuccessfully to locate an account of this historic angling meeting, having ransacked my own library with no result. Ashley-Cooper mentions Wulff's methods, but not the event. Rudd himself extensively covers the meeting between LaBranche and A.H.E. Wood in _Greased Line Fishing_, but doesn't mention Wulff. Nothing in Falkus, or even the Philip Knight book.

Can someone help me with the citation. I thought the entire magazine article ill-informed and fatuous and wished to respond with a letter to the editor stating my feelings on the matter. But, I want to have my facts straight.

Thanks in advance
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old 01-30-2006, 09:37 AM
fredaevans fredaevans is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rogue River
Posts: 3,856
Eric, no answer to your question, but this is the third reference (on line boards) to the event I've seen in as many days.
Fred
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3  
Old 01-30-2006, 10:03 AM
Willie Gunn's Avatar
Willie Gunn Willie Gunn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Spey, Deveron.Brora, Ness, Connon, Beauly
Posts: 1,096
I watched Americans who fished the Spey with a single handed rod. Sorry I'll start again I've watched Americans with single handed rods spend their holiday climbing every tree on the beat to rescue their flies.

Cairnton is one of the few beats you could cover the water almost as effectively with a single handed rod.
__________________
Willie Gunn
Quot homines tot sententiae

www.speygillie.co.uk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4  
Old 01-30-2006, 12:21 PM
Eric's Avatar
Eric Eric is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 961
Interesting point: A.H.E. Wood fished only single-handed rods. Of course, they were 12 feet long.

Petri heil,

Eric
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5  
Old 01-30-2006, 03:06 PM
flytyer flytyer is offline
Pullin' Thread
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Washington
Posts: 3,346
Talking

Eric,

I recall reading somewhere in the past that Wulff caught a single salmon on the "show down" day on a skated dry, while Rudd didn't touch a fish on a wet. However, I don't recall where I had read it, although it was over 20 years ago. I wish I could remember the book I read it in, although it wasn't in a bood authored by Wulff.

I also recall seeing in print several authors claiming that Wulff showed Rudd a thing or two about catching salmon and that Wulff also showed Rudd and the other UK fishermen that a 6' rod was all you needed to catch salmon anywhere in the world. Rogowski is the latest person I've read making these claims. But I never read anything written by Wulff himself that made these claims. All I ever read Wulff say was that you could catch salmon on much smaller and lighter rods than most people think.

I read the Rogowski article last week and I'm going to be sending a letter to the editor of Fly Rod & Reel as well about it and Rogowski's obvious rant directed toward 2-handed rods. Don't you just love these guys out to prove 2-handers are unsporting and 2-heaby and unwieldy for pleasurable fishing? And that with Rogowski's "monster" 12' rod no less. I suppose he would go into appoplexy if he would see someone fishing with a 16'-18' rod!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6  
Old 01-30-2006, 10:26 PM
Eric's Avatar
Eric Eric is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 961
Rogowski's article bothered me on many levels. First, he has not the background or experience in Spey casting to make a proper evaluation and make considered criticisms of double-handed casting. Second, he assumes that all Spey casters want to do is to cast as far as they can. Rogowski implies that people who use double-handed rods do not really know how to fish: that they overcast the holding water. Most Spey casters I know are quite adept at reading holding water, near and far, and use the double-hander and Spey techniques as a matter of sweet convenience (not to mention the sheer pleasure of working with the big rod). The casting's easy; you keep the fly in the water; you don't have to watch your backcast (as much); and you can reach to outer fish, should you want to.

Wulff was a man who was so accomplished that he wished to make things more difficult for himself. He had to work very hard to invent and master a technique that would allow him to cover distant fish with his six-foot rod. Al McClane mentions somewhere how difficult it is to throw line with a short rod. McClane and some other expert caster learned, by way of example, how to cast using only the tip section of a rod. I believe they did this as an excursion into the physics of casting -- they did not try to promote it as an effective way to fish.

Wulff trumped everyone by casting without a rod (look, ma, just hands) and caught a salmon thereby.

Wulff also caught salmon on No. 16 dry flies and did an number of other seemingly impossible things.

Wulff, through his notoriety and publications, inspired a host of imitators. People thought if Lee Wulff caught salmon on a six-foot rod using No. 16 skaters, they should try to do it, too. A whole generation of salmon anglers using inadequate tackle was born and the legacy persists today, Rogowski as an example.

I suspect Rogowski wrote the piece as an homage to Wulff, a master salmon angler who eschewed the double-handed rod. That's fine.

But why pick on harmless Spey casters? We're only out there to have fun doing what we do.

-- Eric
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7  
Old 01-31-2006, 02:44 AM
Willie Gunn's Avatar
Willie Gunn Willie Gunn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Spey, Deveron.Brora, Ness, Connon, Beauly
Posts: 1,096
The trouble is that Spey casting was not invented as a technique it evolved a method of catching fish(salmon are refered to as fish a trout is a trout only a salmon is a fish) on the Spey and other Highland rivers. When the gentlemen were arriving on the rivers with the new fangled split cane rods of 12 and 14 ft the gillies were still using the old long greenhearts.
__________________
Willie Gunn
Quot homines tot sententiae

www.speygillie.co.uk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #8  
Old 01-31-2006, 06:36 AM
juro's Avatar
juro juro is offline
Coast2coast Flyfishaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Steelhead country|striper coast|bonefish belt
Posts: 20,593
In a recent conversation in Anne's booth (Marlboro fly show) with 'super' Mario, who is by all accounts the best guide on the Gaspe', he agreed with my theory that the use of the canoe made the use of two-handed rods less practical than useful in the Canadian Maritimes.

Where much of Europe, Scandinavia, and the Pacific Northwest gives the advantage to the Spey caster it has not been hugely advantageous for anglers in the North American Atlantic fishery fishing from or with the use of canoes.

However, it is still advantageous in today's fisheries no matter where you go. What I find odd is the "either or" mentality - I say fish all methods and become capable with them all!
__________________
IFFF Certified THCI @ 2005
Capeflyfisher Guide Service
Island Hopper, Guitarist, Incurable Dreamer
and Founder, Worldwide Flyfishing Forum
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #9  
Old 01-31-2006, 07:40 AM
BLACK FRANCIS's Avatar
BLACK FRANCIS BLACK FRANCIS is offline
Nick Pionessa OOFS
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: wny
Posts: 160
that rag (fly rod and reel to be specific) could not be more hipocritical even in the same issue, with articles about how spey casting is the greatest invention and totaly useless at the same time. it just shows how starved they are for articles. it is this hipocritical attitude that turns people off from this sport and makes honest people look like buffoons because some "expert" they have never met contridicts you and tells them something ludicrous as gospel. i will be answering questions about that in the shop for weeks now, while folks quote the "expert". great.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #10  
Old 01-31-2006, 07:48 AM
sean's Avatar
sean sean is offline
LBFF Mojo
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,160
My first thought when I read the article at the grocery store was...Who the F is Rogowski?

I think that answers any questions about the article. The guy is not involved in the spey community and someone giving him the OK to write the article is BS.

The whole overcasting argument is also tired. Overcasting is a fishing ability deficiency, it has nothing to do with spey rods.

-sean
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #11  
Old 01-31-2006, 11:30 AM
flytyer flytyer is offline
Pullin' Thread
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Washington
Posts: 3,346
BF,

Your point about Fly Rod & Reel speaking out of both sides of their mouth in the aforementioned article is very evident given the article by Simon G. and Gierach's column on using a 2-hander on the Umqua and how much he is enjoying using 2-handed rods for steelhead. Gierach plainly states that he is just a beginner at both steelhead and using 2-handed rods. Wouldn't it be nice if Rogowski had said the same.

Sean, et al,

Absolutely! If a person is not fishing the water near shore (as Rogowski claims 2-hand rod users do), it is clearly fishing fault and not the result of the equipment the angler is using.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #12  
Old 01-31-2006, 11:51 AM
wrke wrke is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Many. From NE salt, Russia, Canadian A Salmon, NW Steelhead, Bahamas, Keys. Live in Upstate NY
Posts: 792
My, my . . . aren't our knickers in a twist!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by sean
My first thought when I read the article at the grocery store was...Who the F is Rogowski?

I think that answers any questions about the article. The guy is not involved in the spey community and someone giving him the OK to write the article is BS.

The whole overcasting argument is also tired. Overcasting is a fishing ability deficiency, it has nothing to do with spey rods.

-sean
Sean, in answer to your first question . . . if you'd taken a minute you'd found out. You shouldn't be so dismissive (and more respectful) of people to who you owe some gratitude. Ted's been an extremely important (and well respected) protector of salmonid conservation most of his life. And along with Lee Wulff, Ed Zern, Ernie Schwiebert and a bunch of others, he was one of the founders of Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, one of the premier salmonid conservation organizations in the country.

Second, because he's not involved in the "spey community" (what's that? I'm not sure I have my club card) doesn't disqualify some of his observations . . . he's been an Atlantic salmon fisher far longer than you've been alive.

Third, we all love our double handed rods and Spey casting. Can you honestly say that you've NEVER shortchanged your time covering water 10' or 20' from you because you get more enjoyment with longer casts? Honestly?

Whereas I don't like Rogowki's inference that a 6' rod for salmon (and his "showboating" friend Wulff) is superior to a fishing a Spey rod, I think the article raises some valid questions that the Spey rod is not always the right tool. He's right that landing fish is more difficult. Have you ever tried to land a 25-30 lb Atlantic salmon by yourself with a Spey rod where it's impossible to beach a fish? And it's true that beaching can be more harmful than netting or hand tailing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BLACK FRANCIS
that rag (fly rod and reel to be specific) could not be more hipocritical even in the same issue, with articles about how spey casting is the greatest invention and totaly useless at the same time. it just shows how starved they are for articles. it is this hipocritical attitude that turns people off from this sport and makes honest people look like buffoons because some "expert" they have never met contridicts you and tells them something ludicrous as gospel. i will be answering questions about that in the shop for weeks now, while folks quote the "expert". great.

-BLACK FRANCIS
Francis, I find absolutely nothing hypocritical in providing opinions from both sides . . . as a matter of fact, I think it's great. Just because we're discovering the advantages of two-handed rods on this side of the pond and they've become the hot, fashionable, the "in" thing doesn't mean that they're the right tool for every situation.

Personally, I am totally addicted to my double-handed rods. One of the most wonderful things about flyfishing for me is that it's an endless supply of beautiful (and enjoyable) problems to be solved. Truely a life-long sport. And learning and perfecting my Spey casting continues to be a joy . . . I can hardly get enough of it.

But, there are times when my single-handed rod is CLEARLY the superior tool for both steelhead and Atlantic salmon. I love them both and use them both.

As I mentioned that I don't agree with the 6' rod and his assertion of Wulff's superior approach, but I hope your customers question you about the article. They will be much better served if you step away from dismissing the shorter rod and educate them about the advantages of both single and double-handed rods.

I do wish the magazine would have more correctly titled it the case against Two-handed rods, but you all know the Spey-fishing are the hot words.

BTW, Ted married his long-time friend's widow Joan Wulff last year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #13  
Old 01-31-2006, 12:06 PM
sean's Avatar
sean sean is offline
LBFF Mojo
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,160
I am well aware of who he is, that was not my point. I probably should not have worded it so strongly but the article got my hackles up.

I just do not appreciate people using their positions to spread mis-informed crap. Yeah he has done some great conservation stuff and is in good with the old guys of the sport. Still think he is misinformed and others who look at what he has done with FFF and such could be easily mislead to believing what he says is gold.

I did not get the feeling he ever fished a double hander with any regularity to really speak with any authority on the subject.

I will say I short changed water when I was learing how to fish. Now that I am a better fisherman I do not do it. When I fished single handers I did the same thing. It had nothing to do with the rod. I stand by the opinion that overcasting is a fishing deficiency, not a casting one.

As a fanactical double hand rod enthusiast I felt misrepresented. That is why the article got my knickers in a twist. He brought nothing new to the table. Just the same old tired arguments.

No disrepect intended to Mr. Rogowski. I just think he is wrong and the article was poor.

-sean

Last edited by sean; 01-31-2006 at 12:13 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #14  
Old 01-31-2006, 01:17 PM
Doublespey's Avatar
Doublespey Doublespey is offline
Steelhead-a-holic
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: PNW Waterways
Posts: 711
Pretty funny

I gotta agree with WRKE on this one.

Sean - yours is a good example. You commented that you overcast fish when learning with a singlehander and that your maturity as an angler, not the lenght of the rod, was the determining factor.

Yet I'd say that the tendency I've seen is much more pronounced with the spey rod than with the single-hander. Sure there are guys who wade up to their tits and double-haul their shooting tapers to the other side of the river, but they are the rarity compared to the two-handed anglers who fall into this trap. Two-handed rods don't cause this, but they certainly tempt it.

Which one is a better tool is determined by the river conditions, the fish being pursued, and the angler. And on either side you'll find anglers who are ~very~ defensive of their chosen tackle.

I love my two handed rods and fish them over 90% of the time. I'm not bad-mouthing their use, just acknowledging that there are tradeoffs and that, as Rogowski noted, single-handed flyrods ~do~ have advantages.

my .02,

DS
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #15  
Old 01-31-2006, 01:47 PM
Willie Gunn's Avatar
Willie Gunn Willie Gunn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Spey, Deveron.Brora, Ness, Connon, Beauly
Posts: 1,096
Not in Scotland, single handed rods are a waste of time unless the water is very low. I cannot understand this arguement about taking longer to land a fish either. If you want you can put the rod over your shoulder then grab the line and play the fish by handline if you want.
__________________
Willie Gunn
Quot homines tot sententiae

www.speygillie.co.uk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Fly Fishing Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Clear tip versus Long Leader. Scott K Pacific Northwest Sea Run Forum 6 03-11-2002 10:19 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 PM.



Copyright Flyfishingforum.com (All Rights Reserved)