Word Travels Fast aka Monster Steelhead - Fly Fishing Forum
Pacific Northwest Sea Run Forum No such thing as rainbow trout, only landlocked steelhead

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-16-2005, 10:53 PM
NrthFrk16's Avatar
NrthFrk16 NrthFrk16 is offline
Mod
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: NF Stilliguamish
Posts: 1,687
Send a message via AIM to NrthFrk16
Word Travels Fast aka Monster Steelhead

Todd R. posted this another site and I figured, since many of us fish the system this fish came out of, you would all like to see it.

Fish was caught in John Koening's boat of John's Guide Service. I hope John doesn't mind me passing this photo on....

42.5x25.5...a little over 35 pounds. Now someone catch this beauty with a fly.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	35skagit.jpg
Views:	524
Size:	40.8 KB
ID:	4594  
__________________
Ryan S. Petzold
aka Sparkey and/or Special

Last edited by NrthFrk16; 03-16-2005 at 10:54 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old 03-17-2005, 12:39 AM
Todd Ripley Todd Ripley is offline
Token Gear Guy
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 139
That would be from the Sauk River, lower drift, if you didn't recognize the shoulders on it!

Fish on...

Todd
__________________
Todd Ripley
VP Political Affairs
Wild Steelhead Coalition
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3  
Old 03-17-2005, 01:32 PM
Salmo_g Salmo_g is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Skagit
Posts: 47
Yeah, I think that very fish grabbed my fly last Friday - when he was a shade brighter, and further downriver, too. But the size one hook was simply too, too small to gain meaningful purchase in its big, gaping, maw. Yeah, that's why I wasn't able to take, and post a photo of the beast.

t.i.c.,

Salmo g.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4  
Old 03-17-2005, 09:27 PM
Joe Joe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 2
It's a nice fish, but isn't it being handled illegally? It's completely out of the water.

Joe
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5  
Old 03-17-2005, 09:35 PM
marketic marketic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: sol duc
Posts: 99
Not To Be a Wet Blanket, but...

To quote the somewhat irrascible Karl Mauser:

"Ever since they went Catch and Release it seems everybody and his brother is catching 30 pound fish...."

It's a gorgeous fish but nevertheless, it would fit inside a 30 lb + fish.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6  
Old 03-18-2005, 03:28 PM
Salmo_g Salmo_g is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Skagit
Posts: 47
Marketic,

I wouldn't be so sure. I caught a 41.5 X 22 or 22.5 a few years ago, which I believe would have been a tight fit inside a 30# steelhead. This one is enough larger that I don't think it could fit.

Did Karl ever post the length and girth of his biggest Kispiox fish?

I agree that we don't have enough data points to be real confident in the weight prediction formula, but every example I've come across indicates that the extra girth really adds up with each extra inch of length with steelhead greater than 36 - 38 inches. Friends of mine have landed a 45" and almost 48" in years past, but no girth measurement, and we have no idea what those magnificent fish weighed. And it simply doesn't matter.

Sincerely,

Salmo g.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7  
Old 03-18-2005, 07:05 PM
marketic marketic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: sol duc
Posts: 99
I believe Mauser's fish was 42 x 24. But girth is not the final word; it's how far that girth carries back past the anal fin into the peduncle and forward into the pectoral girdle. I once saw a Skeena fish that taped out at 38" but I know would have gone mid-twenties had it been weighed. Not only was it deeper then deep but the depth was constant from the tip of its jaw to its tail. It looked like the fish had been spawned in the effluent of a nuke plant.

I realize discussions about fish size are all a bit goofy (like Hemingway and his fellow hunting companions drooling single malt as they argued about whose kudu horns were larger) but for the sake of a priori scientific method, I felt some perspective might be in order.

The buck in the attached pic taped out at 42". I figured it as a "mid-to-upper twenty" fish, got a quick photo then sent him on his way. A girth measurement wouldn't have made me any more or less happier with the fish and wouldn't have chaged my approximation of weight to any signifcant degree.

I once had a 39 lb buck in my arms (it was absolutely chrome, seine-caught out of Rupert, weighed on a digital scale). Having something like that cutched to my chest has put all the other steelhead I have seen since that day into proper perspective, including that Sauk fish. Gorgeous fish, definite upper twenties, maybe 30 on a stretch, but not mid thirties.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Picture 131.jpg
Views:	394
Size:	29.8 KB
ID:	4606  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #8  
Old 03-18-2005, 07:41 PM
t_richerzhagen t_richerzhagen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Deschutes, Ronde, Snake, Walla Walla
Posts: 720
New Sturdy formula

says that 42.5 x 25.5 should weigh 36.8 #.
__________________
Ted
Speyclave Contributor

Practice is about increasing your repertoire of ways to recover from your mistakes. Joann C. Gutin
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #9  
Old 03-19-2005, 08:54 AM
marketic marketic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: sol duc
Posts: 99
Perhaps. And the Census Bureau also tells us that there are 1.2 children in every American household.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #10  
Old 03-19-2005, 04:35 PM
Todd Ripley Todd Ripley is offline
Token Gear Guy
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 139
Thumbs down Give it a break, guys!

I'm sensing the interesting combination of "flyfishing elitism" and the color on the end of a Green Butt Skunk...not very complementary...or complimentary, for that matter.

It's a nice fish, caught in a local stream, and whoever caught it, on whatever they caught it on, shouldn't be reduced to quibbling over ounces...save it for quibbling over ounces of single malt around the campfire at night.

Fish on...

Todd
__________________
Todd Ripley
VP Political Affairs
Wild Steelhead Coalition
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #11  
Old 03-20-2005, 01:34 AM
tbuehrens tbuehrens is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 57
I for one think its a great fish.
-Tom
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #12  
Old 03-22-2005, 11:59 AM
Salmo_g Salmo_g is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Skagit
Posts: 47
The standard

People will do what they want, and making sense isn't high on everyone's list. All the men who are worried about the size of the lump in their pants really do seem to care too much about how many points on the deer or elk and how many pounds the steelhead weighs. Most trophy wild steelhead are caught from waters where they must be released these days. Weighing them on a certified scale isn't really an option. Length and girth are practical attributes of the fish's size that are reasonably obtained. I think that information tells us as much as anyone really needs to know about the size of the fish. Debating the unknowable seems about as constructive as the public's second guessing the right thing to do in the Terri Schiavo case currently in the news.

Sincerely,

Salmo g.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #13  
Old 03-23-2005, 10:08 AM
mattzoid's Avatar
mattzoid mattzoid is offline
Registered Spey Offender
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Any body of water flowing to the Pacific
Posts: 392
Salmo has hit this on the head. Unless youíre in the personís shoes, it really is hard to make the call. Iíve had several patients with peg tubes like Schiavo and with the same mental status. I have removed their tubes too. It is a very personal issue and it should remain so.

Iíve never caught a 35 pound fish and wouldnít dare to tell you what it was like or debate ounces. It was his experience and no matter how we try, we may never know what it was like. It must be glorious to have a brute like that bend your rod. Iíll bet I wouldn't be worried about ounces while I tried to get it to hand.
__________________
Spey casters do it with longer rods

Matt Burke

Last edited by mattzoid; 03-23-2005 at 10:09 AM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Fly Fishing Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any word? Venture Classic Atlantic Salmon 10 11-07-2006 10:14 AM
Monster Steelhead StealthStalker Worldwide Flyfishing Discussion 5 08-26-2003 08:02 AM
Hal, aka pmfly ..etc. Hello? fredaevans Great Lakes Steelhead & Salmon 2 06-02-2003 09:45 PM
The Crabmeister - aka - Striblue kush Stripers and Coastal Gamefish 1 01-27-2003 10:21 PM
5-5: Seen in my travels... bdowning Stripers and Coastal Gamefish 4 05-07-2001 12:16 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:43 PM.



Copyright Flyfishingforum.com (All Rights Reserved)