Who's number 1? - Fly Fishing Forum
Pacific Northwest Sea Run Forum No such thing as rainbow trout, only landlocked steelhead

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 13 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
Old 01-28-2005, 09:40 AM
KerryS KerryS is offline
Skidrow Woolley Fly Club
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Skagit system
Posts: 661
Who's number 1?

"Top 20 steelhead rankings change
For as long as recreational steelhead catch data has been compiled, the Skagit River has been on the state's top-20 list. Up until the 1960s, the Skagit was the No. 1 river, with an annual sports catch of more than 20,000 steelhead. Today, the Cascade River occupies the No. 20 position and the Skagit is unranked.

Why has the Skagit fallen on such hard times?

For an answer to that question, I contacted WDFW fisheries biologist Curt Kraemer. Kraemer said the effects of logging from l960 through 1980 are still coming home to roost along with flow issues and modifications in the mainstem of the river.

All these factors have decreased its carrying capacity and productivity.

Kraemer also said that smolt to adult survival in Puget Sound and Georgia Strait is only one-tenth of what it was 20 years ago.

While the ocean conditions for salmon have generally been good during the last few spawning cycles, the same has not been true for steelhead.

But the adult steelhead returns were up slightly in 2004 and Kraemer believes the marine conditions may be on the mend.

As far as the Skagit's former No. 1 ranking, Kraemer said wild steelhead made up a large percentage of the annual catch. Today, wild steelhead are protected, so the total annual catch would be lower.

On a different topic, Kraemer said a prediction on the size of the 2005 pink salmon run in Puget Sound and the Skagit River won't be made until the North of Falcon meetings get underway."

The above was cut out of the below article which appeared in the Skagit Valley Herald yesterday 1-27-2005.

Am I missing something here? We used to harvest 20,000 steelhead from the Skagit annually. 20,000! Apparently the fact we took 20,000 steelhead out of the river each year, 3 times the minimum escapement for the Skagit today, had nothing to do with the decline of steelhead in the Skagit River. It is the fault of logging and the ocean. And the logging didnít start until the 1960s. What? The largest logging operations in the Skagit watershed took place long before the 60s. Try the late 1800s and the early 1900s through the mid 1900s was when the majority of the logging took place. For some reason I get the idea that WDFW doesnít want to admit they may have allowed a bit of over harvest or are they saying that if we would have continued to harvest 20,000 steelhead each year the Skagit would still be #1?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Old 01-28-2005, 11:30 AM
jjohnson's Avatar
jjohnson jjohnson is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sky, North Umpqua
Posts: 138
Kerry why would they admit to something they don't believe. They stand by their belief that harvest has had no impact on river systems. Nothing they control has had a negative impact (harvest and Hatcheries). These are all good things for a river. Only things that the WDFW can't control is to blame. How scary is that.

Can't even pass the straight face test.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 01-28-2005, 12:21 PM
wet fly wet fly is offline
Registered User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Stilly
Posts: 134
Kerry, During the 60s the Game Dept. thought the fish runs would never end. There were so many steelhead they open the upper spawning sections of the river. Pilchuck Creek above hwy 9 and North Fork of the Stilly above the Swede Heaven bridge just to name a couple. I would also like to know why the hatchery return was so plentyful at that time. I remember the Skagit and Stilly had either the left ventral or the right ventral fin clipped. At least half the fish we caught here in the Stilly were from the Skagit. The good ol days they did not last forever. Jerry
wet fly
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 01-28-2005, 04:49 PM
flytyer flytyer is offline
Pullin' Thread
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Washington
Posts: 3,346

The sad part is the number of fishermen who still think the fish are abundant and that preventing them from bonking wild fish is taking away their right to fish.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-01-2005, 03:08 PM
Salmo_g Salmo_g is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Skagit
Posts: 47
The Skagit River sustained steelhead harvests of about 20,000 fish annually only during the relatively short period of ~ 1962 - 1972, when both hatchery and wild fish were abundant. Prior to that time, neither hatchery nor wild steelhead were abundant enough to support that large a harvest at a sustained level.

Since that time some significant changes have occurred. Ocean survival of steelhead has decreased, so both hatchery and wild steelhead are less abundant. For some reason, Chambers Creek hatchery steelhead don't do too well in the Skagit system. I don't know how well they ever did, but it appeared as though they contributed quite well to harvests in the 1960s and early 1970s. Many hatchery programs are characterized by especially high survival and success during their first years of operation, and then they decline to some lower, but stable level. Lastly, the productivity and capacity of the Skagit system to rear steelhead has decreased due to habitat degradation. No matter how many spawners there are, habitat capacity and productivity will limit the number of wild smolts produced, which multiplied by the ocean survival rate determines the adult steelhead yield.

Overharvest of wild steelhead probably had its most severe effect during the period 1968 to 1974, in my estimation. The reason is that the indicators of population decline were not obvious (I know, they should have been, but that's a different story), and no harvest restrictions were imposed during that time. The river closed earlier beginning in 1976, and wild steelhead escapements and production began creeping back up, from about 2,000 or 3,000 to 8,000 in 1982 and 16,000 in 1986. While there have been wild steelhead harvests during the 1980s and 1990s, and 2,000s, it's extremely unlikely that the numbers harvested were high enough to limit subsequent production in any significant way.

I doubt that the Skagit will ever again be the number one producer of harvested steelhead in the state. The reason is that even with improved ocean survival and somewhat recovered habitat (don't ever expect pristine habitat productivity) there won't be enough wild steelhead to sustain those peak harvest levels of 1968-1972. Further, unless a modification of the hatchery program greatly increases yields on the Skagit, there won't be enough hatchery steelhead to contribute to repeat those peak harvest years.

It's not correct to assert that WDFW doesn't admit overharvest hasn't contributed to the decline of fish populations. But context is critical to describing and explaining which harvests were overharvests. The relatively low harvests of wild Skagit steelhead since 1977 have more likely than not, had little to no effect on subsequent run sizes. The overwhelming limitations on run size for the last 14 years have been the Skagit system's own productivity and capacity and ocean survival.


Salmo g.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Fly Fishing Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Home Waters
Your home waters
Current Favorite Fly
If you only had one... (change anytime)


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Crab Apple-Number 2 striblue >> Archive: Striper (etc) Flies 5 11-27-2002 07:54 PM
Sean, did I get number 7,000? fredaevans Worldwide Flyfishing Discussion 3 07-23-2002 01:17 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:37 PM.

vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright Flyfishingforum.com (All Rights Reserved)