Cortland 555 floating ghost tip surprise - Please Help - Fly Fishing Forum
Gear Talk - Fly Stuff Spoken Here Sage advice & fresh perspectives

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-13-2004, 07:52 PM
Casper Casper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada, SK
Posts: 4
Question Cortland 555 floating ghost tip surprise - Please Help



Having heard good reviews about this line, I bought it on ebay. I tried it out yesterday for the first time and it scares me.

First of all, it had a memory from hell. How exactly should I stretch this particular line and how often do I have to do it?

Secondly, the line feels "hard" between the fingers compared to other floating lines. Is this normal?

To sum it up,
It's like fishing with a coily floating nylon guitar string - and it's not that green either. Makes me wonder...is this perhaps the answer to the previous questions. Could this line be old and sun-damaged?

Thanks
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old 08-13-2004, 09:18 PM
brooklynangler brooklynangler is offline
Law Student
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 231
Send a message via AIM to brooklynangler
555

I have a hard time understanding the 555 other than the "Little Tunny" line, which is excellent.

The floater is quite simply the worst line I've ever used on any rod, bar none. I had the "golden" 5 wt, and the "clear" 5 weight and I just don't get it! Just the worst stiffness and memory of ANY line, let alone a trout line. No redeeming values at all.

Anyone with industry inside info have the real skinny on how a LINE company who is supposed to test their lines could produce such a dog...and still be selling it.

I am embarassed FOR Cortland. Their 444 is, on the other hand, my favorite trout line.

Joe
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3  
Old 08-14-2004, 12:44 AM
Slinger's Avatar
Slinger Slinger is offline
CantAnchorUs
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 733
We`ve been complaining about the 555 for a couple of years now and Cortland just keeps turning them out. They don`t even have the common sense to stop making them and admit it was a failure.
Slinger
__________________
Steve
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4  
Old 08-14-2004, 10:04 AM
old man old man is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Stilly and Sky
Posts: 204
If you read the fine print that comes with the package,it states that you have to stretch the line every so often. I bought it when it first came out and since then I have gone back to my 444 which is in my opinion a better line hands down than the 555. It floats nice but the coiling of the line throws it all off.

I used to stretch it before each use but got tired of it especially in cold weather.

Jim
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5  
Old 08-18-2004, 04:50 PM
Casper Casper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada, SK
Posts: 4
Well, that's surprising. Thanks for your input. Anyone out there that uses it and likes it???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6  
Old 08-18-2004, 06:26 PM
jfbasser's Avatar
jfbasser jfbasser is offline
Pencil me in.....
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Nearside of the Middleside
Posts: 1,070
I have heard rumors that the 666 is on the way to save face
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7  
Old 08-18-2004, 08:55 PM
flyfisha1's Avatar
flyfisha1 flyfisha1 is offline
Marine Scientist
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC, South Jersey, Eastern PA
Posts: 1,080
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfbasser
I have heard rumors that the 666 is on the way to save face
Religious fisherman everywhere will shun this line!

What a bummer about the 555. I, too, like the 444 lines. I don't think I've ever used anything so supple yet that casts well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #8  
Old 08-19-2004, 06:56 AM
FredA's Avatar
FredA FredA is online now
Middle Aged Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Bicep to elbow
Posts: 1,857
On the positive side, I've got a 555 QD 350 grn that I think I like. The running line is less snarly than the 444QD.
__________________
Fred A.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Fly Fishing Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cortland 555 Floating Green Ghost Tip tws Warmwater flyfishing 2 05-23-2005 08:47 PM
Cortland 555 Little Tunney line... ssully Gear Talk - Fly Stuff Spoken Here 0 05-09-2002 07:56 PM
New Cortland 555 NrthFrk16 Stripers and Coastal Gamefish 9 10-19-2001 07:26 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:36 PM.



Copyright Flyfishingforum.com (All Rights Reserved)