Oceans in Deep Trouble - Fly Fishing Forum
Our Environment We are stewards of wild places

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-21-2004, 11:10 AM
Dble Haul's Avatar
Dble Haul Dble Haul is offline
Fly chucker
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: New England
Posts: 3,674
Oceans in Deep Trouble

OCEANS IN DEEP TROUBLE; U.S. MUST HELP, PANEL SAYS

By Andrew Martin Washington Bureau

Citing increasing pressures from pollution, overfishing and residential development, a federal commission on Tuesday called for sweeping changes in how the U.S. manages the oceans, including allocating billions of dollars in gas and oil royalties for ocean preservation.

The U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy, created by Congress in 2000 and appointed by President Bush (news - web sites), concluded that human actions have seriously jeopardized the health of the oceans, from huge and toxic algae blooms to depletion of fish stocks. Only a major overhaul of federal policy could reverse the trend, the commission found in its 413-page report.

While the report focused primarily on oceans, the commission also addressed the Great Lakes and urged steps to curb problems caused by pollution and invasive species such as the zebra mussel.

"If our report is adopted, the payoff will be great," said retired Adm. James Watkins, committee chairman. "It's now obvious that ocean resources are not limitless, nor are ocean waters capable of continual self-cleansing. The point is this: It's up to us to find ways to use and enjoy the oceans in a sustainable way."

To attack the problems, the commission said the federal government must work to streamline ocean management, which is spread among "a confusing array of agencies at the federal, state and local levels."

Needed: Wider view

The report also called for a fundamental change in how the government addresses ocean problems, urging "ecosystem-based management," which focuses on entire regions, rather than the current policy of addressing each species or habitat in isolation.

The commission recommended creation of a National Ocean Council, to be chaired by an assistant to the president, and for doubling the amount of federal funding for ocean research.

The report was the government's first comprehensive look at ocean policy since the Stratton Commission issued Our Nation and the Sea more than 30 years ago.

Numbers adding up

Since then, "more than 37 million people, 19 million homes and countless businesses have been added to coastal areas," the report said, noting an increase in the nation's use of offshore oil and gas, marine transportation and coastal tourism.

"These developments, however, come with costs, and we are only now discovering the extent of those costs in terms of depleted resources, lost habitat and polluted waters," the report said.

Several environmental groups hailed the report and said it is a mandate for Congress and Bush to act.

Cameron Davis, executive director of the Lake Michigan Federation, said the timing was perfect because there is legislation pending in Congress to restore the Great Lakes.

"We need to do something, and we need to do something fast, or we are going to spend many times more to clean up existing messes," Davis said, but "a report like this can't mandate political will. At the end of the day, that's what we need more than anything else."

Sarah Chasis, a senior attorney for the National Resources Defense Council, said the commission's report highlighted many of the same themes that were outlined in a Pew Oceans Commission report in 2003.

"You have both of them basically saying we have serious degradation, we need to act," Chasis said.

The commission's report will be sent to the nation's governors for comment. Once the governors' comments are reviewed, a final version of the report will be sent to Bush and Congress.

Let Washington pay, chief says

Commission Chairman Watkins made a point of saying that there were no "unfunded mandates" in the report, which would require states to pay for reforms. Rather, the commission laid out a funding scheme by year to detail how the federal government could pay for the plan, which includes 54 recommendations for Congress, 69 for the president, 125 for federal agencies and 13 for states, Watkins said.

The commission calls for $4 billion a year from oil and gas royalties paid to the government from offshore drilling operations to be placed into an Ocean Policy Trust Fund. The commission estimates it would cost $1.3 billion to implement its recommendations in the first year, $2.4 billion the second and $3.2 billion in subsequent years.

"Will this be tough to sell?" Watkins asked. "You better believe it. But we're going to go for it."

Ted Beattie, president and chief executive officer of the John G. Shedd Aquarium and a member of the commission, said a crucial aspect of the report is a recommendation to educate the public on the perilous condition of the oceans and the Great Lakes.

"There hasn't been a strong PR effort to tell people what the situation is," Beattie said, adding, "If we don't get after these problems, they are only going to get worse."

- - -

INCREASING OCEAN USE SPURS CALL FOR PROTECTION

A presidential commission on Tuesday recommended the creation of a fund to help protect the oceans. The fund would be paid for through oil and gas royalties paid to the federal government. Since 1970, the growing U.S. population and expanded commerce have put added pressure on the ocean ecosystem.

COST OF PLAN

Year 1: $1.3 billion

Year 2: $2.4

Year 3:* $3.2

*Also each year thereafter

U.S. COASTAL POPULATION*

Scale in millions

2000: 145.5 million

NORTH AMERICA SHIPPING

Tons of goods loaded; scale in millions

2000: 513.8 million

U.S. AND CANADA CRUISE PASSENGERS

Scale in millions

2000: 6.9 million

*For coastal watershed counties

Sources: U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy, United Nations (news - web sites) Conference on Trade and Development, Cruise Lines International Association

Chicago Tribune
__________________
Mark
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old 04-21-2004, 05:53 PM
Moonlight Moonlight is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North West
Posts: 883
As an add on...

The folks who are trying so hard to "develop" the offshore oil and gas resereves are also throwing into this plan the offshore mariculture farms in the FCZ out to 200 miles. They are claiming that this will generate fed funds for more management and controls.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3  
Old 04-23-2004, 10:04 AM
OC OC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: I've lost them all but I'm looking for new ones
Posts: 1,368
Unhappy

If we read between the lines does this mean that oil and gas companies will be allowed to drill just about anywhere off shore they want because they are going to pay royalaties to help clean up the oceans? Hey maybe we can get developers to pay royalaties on the profits they make developing all our wet lands. Those royalaties could be use to help save the wet land they just paved under.

GW speech in Maine was such BS yesterday. He says he has created what was it 3 million acres of wet lands in the time he has come to office. What he didn't say was that we lost over 20 million acres of wet lands due to poor policy that allows developers pretty much a free ride to fill it all in.
__________________
OC
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Fly Fishing Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trouble getting through? juro Worldwide Flyfishing Discussion 9 06-01-2005 12:37 PM
CO2 and it's effect on the Oceans GregD Our Environment 1 10-13-2004 10:48 PM
Reply from CA Oceans and Fisheries about Skeena netting B. Gray Pacific Northwest Sea Run Forum 16 08-16-2002 09:47 AM
Server trouble FishHawk Stripers and Coastal Gamefish 0 07-18-2001 04:38 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:51 PM.



Copyright Flyfishingforum.com (All Rights Reserved)