Puget Sound Area 9 Closing! - Fly Fishing Forum
Ocean Flyfishing for Salmon Perhaps the most under-rated fishery in the world

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-03-2003, 10:05 AM
Leland Miyawaki Leland Miyawaki is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Washington
Posts: 366
Puget Sound Area 9 Closing!

Fellow flyfishers,

Yesterday, I submitted public testimony at the North of Falcon meeting where the salmon seasons for Washington, including Puget Sound, are set.

At a previous meeting, it was decided to close Area 9 to all fishing. This includes fishing from the beach for the month of July, which was open last year. I tried to get them to reverse the decision yesterday.

There is still time to voice your opinion. They will begin finalizing the rule changes this coming monday.

It appears that the WDFW does not have a model that includes beach fishing. In other words, they don't know how many people fish the beaches in July for early coho in an area that includes: Point No Point, Eglon, Salisbury Park, Marrowstone Island, and all the west shore of Whidbey Island. Area 9 affords the most opportunities in Puget Sound for catching coho from the shore.

I thought the closing was terribly unfair to people who: prefer to fish from the beach; don't have or can't afford boats; vacationing families at the State Parks (Casey, So. Whidbey, Flagler etc.) spending a summer vacation, including the 4th of July, during a down economy fishing from the beach; and definitely those of us who catch and release while flyfishing.

If you would like to voice your opinion while letting the WDFW know how many people fish from the beaches of Area 9, email:

Pat Patillo at: PATTIPLP@dfw.wa.gov

Phil Anderson at: ANDERPMA@dfw.wa.gov

Tony Floor at: floortaf@dfw.wa.gov


Thanks,
Leland.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #2  
Old 04-03-2003, 11:32 AM
sean's Avatar
sean sean is offline
LBFF Mojo
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 2,160
Hey Leland,

My emails are on the way. What is the reasoning behind this??? Is it to protect bottom fish or salmon?

-sean
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3  
Old 04-03-2003, 12:04 PM
Leland Miyawaki Leland Miyawaki is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Washington
Posts: 366
There was some heavy lobbying by boaters and special interest groups from Port Townsend and Port Angeles to open a previously closed chinook kill fishery in April under the guise of protecting a Dungeness run of chinook.

We were the victim of some heavy handed horse-trading.

Leland.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4  
Old 04-03-2003, 12:12 PM
juro's Avatar
juro juro is offline
Coast2coast Flyfishaholic
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Steelhead country|striper coast|bonefish belt
Posts: 20,593
Emails on the way... I've left many footprints on those beaches myself in the 80's and early 90's. Another example of wholesale regulation without taking the time to consider the impacts to everybody IMHO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5  
Old 04-03-2003, 12:32 PM
flyfisha1's Avatar
flyfisha1 flyfisha1 is offline
Marine Scientist
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NYC, South Jersey, Eastern PA
Posts: 1,080
Quote:
Originally posted by juro
...Another example of wholesale regulation without taking the time to consider the impacts to everybody IMHO.
Yet another example of special interest groups with their head buried in their @$$e$, IMHO. I'm getting tired of reading and hearing about all of these groups taking matters into their own hands and deciding "what's best" for the species in question, as well as for those people having an impact, or being impacted by, the presence of the species, particularly when there's a hidden agenda driving the decision-making. Perhaps it's time for me to get out of the aquarium industry and use my education and experience to start slapping these groups upside the head.
Pardon my tone, but it's frustrating... recreational fishing accounted for over $116 BILLION during 2001 (the latest data available); do these idiots honestly believe that with all the money spent by recreational anglers, many of us who know the habits and life histories of the fish better than researchers, we would want this pastime to go away? Of course we don't; we want the fisheries to thrive. DUH!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Fly Fishing Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bait in Puget Sound juro Ocean Flyfishing for Salmon 2 09-03-2008 10:01 AM
Stick a Fork in Puget Sound? Leland Miyawaki Ocean Flyfishing for Salmon 1 10-04-2006 03:26 PM
Puget Sound going under! OC Our Environment 3 10-19-2005 01:02 PM
Puget Sound Salmon Leland Miyawaki Ocean Flyfishing for Salmon 9 07-26-2002 09:01 PM
Kings in Puget Sound NWflyfisher Ocean Flyfishing for Salmon 3 06-20-2001 09:37 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45 AM.



Copyright Flyfishingforum.com (All Rights Reserved)