SA Sharkskin for salt - Fly Fishing Forum
Lines, Loops and Leaders Line / Leader Recipes, Loops, Splices, etc.

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-21-2008, 10:28 AM
tatco tatco is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South Platte, Colorado
Posts: 9
SA Sharkskin for salt

Has anybody used Scientific Anglers new SharkSkin line for fishing bones or tarpon? It's an expensive line with some pretty good reviews. Before I shell out $100 I'd like to know a little bit more about it from the real experts. Somebody that doesn't have a vested interest in selling the line. Thanks.

Heading back to Long Island, Bahamas for a couple of weeks of Bones in Mid April. Any recent reports would be most appreciated.
Reply With Quote
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-21-2008, 02:13 PM
JR SPEY JR SPEY is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just about anywhere
Posts: 624
The only way anyone could fish one for tarpon is if they were fishing for baby tarpon as the heaviest Sharkskin line that I'm aware of is an 8 weight. I've played with it a little bit and think it might be an OK line for bonefish. I don't think it would necessarily be my first choice, though. If you do try one let us know what you think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 02-21-2008, 08:10 PM
tatco tatco is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South Platte, Colorado
Posts: 9
Actually SA has the Sharkskin for salt in WF-6F through WF-12-F. I'll probably get the line and see how it compares to the rio and Mastery lines I usually use for bones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-20-2008, 11:51 PM
bonehead's Avatar
bonehead bonehead is offline
Cert. Amateur Bugslinger
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cayman Islands
Posts: 101
Sharky's machine...

Just got my #8 salty sharkskin out on the water for the first time today. Couple first impressions.

1) Feels awfully light, as if it were a toy line and not the genuine article. I'm sure this is an illusion of some kind, though, as they'd have to make it somewhere within the standards of the grain-weight for a #8 line. Probably.

2) Lots of people have bitched about the sound this line makes as you cast it. And bitched. And bitched. I've got to say, so far that's my favorite part about the line. I can actually hear my cast, which actually gives me another way to guage the speed of my haul. And, there's no way it makes nearly enough noise to spook fish. No way.

3) It does cast a mile, but the super long head/front taper makes it take a little while to load. I much prefer my Cortland 555 (which they've sadly discontinued) for actual bonefishing so far. Loads in an instant, shoots a mile, and actually floats.

4) Speaking of floating, this line does and doesn't. The line out fron of the rod that I just cast floats high and easy. No worries, but the line beside me does sink and seems to actually grab the water a little more than you're standard line. Of course, there's probably some physicist or engineer as SA that will argue that with me, but it's my feeling so far. (So's you know, I almost strictly wade fish so place a lot of value on a line that floats beside me while I'm waiting to cast and doesn't sink and catch corals, weeds, shoe laces, zippers, and what all else.)

Ok, so 4 isn't a couple, but that's the skinny so far. I'll update later after I've put it through the wringer. For the next 30 days it'll be my designated bonefish, permit, and baby poon line.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-21-2008, 07:56 AM
Dave17's Avatar
Dave17 Dave17 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 673
I have a couple of buddies that have had the line and have stopped using it. The big knock that I've heard so far is that the line eats through the ceramic liner on the stripping guide while fighting fish.

My friend had it in a five weight and he stopped using it after he noticed a groove from simply fighting a couple of large trout.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-21-2008, 09:56 AM
josko josko is offline
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 568
I tried the sharkskinn line for flats fishing and found that it picked up grit, and the 'sharkiness' wore off quite quickly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Fly Fishing Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Home Waters
Your home waters
Current Favorite Fly
If you only had one... (change anytime)


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sci Angler Sharkskin shooting line flywriter Worldwide Flyfishing Discussion 1 02-02-2010 01:39 PM
NIB: SA Sharkskin Steelhead Tapers Smolt For Sale by Owner 2 05-20-2009 01:14 PM
SA Sharkskin Steelhead Taper GaspeSalmonBum Classic Atlantic Salmon 10 08-27-2008 06:42 PM
Sharkskin line JusBones Bonefish, Tarpon, and other Obsessions 2 08-01-2008 08:24 AM
sharkskin dry Gear Talk - Fly Stuff Spoken Here 39 06-22-2008 03:50 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:00 PM.

vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright (All Rights Reserved)