Different lies - Fly Fishing Forum
Pacific Northwest Sea Run Forum No such thing as rainbow trout, only landlocked steelhead

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-12-2004, 09:49 AM
KerryS KerryS is offline
Skidrow Woolley Fly Club
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Skagit system
Posts: 661
Different lies

Are the steelhead holding in different water then in previous years?

My steelheading success rate this spring seems to be considerably lower then in previous years. Also, it seems that most of the other fly fishermen I talk to are having a less then stellar year.


The little success I have had I seem to be finding fish in deeper, slower water then in the past. Anyone else experiencing the same scenerio?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #2  
Old 04-12-2004, 10:27 AM
sinktip's Avatar
sinktip sinktip is offline
Chief of E.P.
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: All S-Rivers Above the Equator
Posts: 1,456
Kerry,

Interesting question. Post February 28th, I haven't hooked a fish in either traditional water or the water you describe. I just attributed it to few fish around. In the winter season I managed to hook a few and all seemed to be in the lies I would expect. All that proves though is that is the water I was fishing. Curious to hear what others think.

'tip
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3  
Old 04-12-2004, 10:51 AM
MJC's Avatar
MJC MJC is offline
Junkyard Spey
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Clearwater River, Peck, ID
Posts: 887
Hey Kerry...

Quote:
My steelheading success rate this spring seems to be considerably lower then in previous years.
That's cause OC is out on the streams at night herding them steelhead away from you boy's "honeyholes".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4  
Old 04-12-2004, 11:58 AM
fredaevans fredaevans is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rogue River
Posts: 3,856
Personally, I'm finding the same thing on the upper Rogue.

'Classic holding' water from past years has shown me very in the way of results. Places I'd rarily fish are producing the most hook ups. It appears that a few squirts of high water last, and this, winter really changed severl major lies.

In one major case it looks like all the gravel that the fish would hold in has been swept clean right down to bed rock. To make things even more interesting (lower Modoc Ponds bar) has had a major tree dump into the river. That will screw up casting/fly swing .... sigh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5  
Old 04-12-2004, 12:22 PM
Doublespey's Avatar
Doublespey Doublespey is offline
Steelhead-a-holic
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: PNW Waterways
Posts: 711
Yep, new water

Many good pools on the Skagihomaguamish have been silted by the floods, and new pools and runs have been created. As Dec once commented to me - time to relearn the river!

Than being said, the steelhead I've hooked and witnessed hooked/landed this year have all come from typical steelhead water. It's just in different places this year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6  
Old 04-12-2004, 01:46 PM
flytyer flytyer is offline
Pullin' Thread
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Washington
Posts: 3,346
Kerry,

The two steelhead that I hooked since March 1st were both found in the bottom half of tailouts. I've managed to hook dollies virtually every time out though in water I expect to find steelhead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7  
Old 04-12-2004, 01:49 PM
Brian Simonseth's Avatar
Brian Simonseth Brian Simonseth is offline
Jolly Buddha
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: CHROME TRIANGLE !
Posts: 589
Talking Skagihomaguamish

I have to find that river!
__________________
Brian

THE NEWER CHIEF of E.P.

Real Steelhead Don't Eat Pellets!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #8  
Old 04-12-2004, 05:09 PM
andre andre is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: OR, WA, BC
Posts: 740
Kerry, while I haven't fished much this spring I've done exceptionally well. I don't think steelhead have changed the type of water, but as the floods go so does the holding water. We all know perfect runs that for some reason don't hold fish, the slow deep water you speak of may have some new structure effecting the current?

andre
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #9  
Old 04-12-2004, 09:55 PM
KerryS KerryS is offline
Skidrow Woolley Fly Club
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Skagit system
Posts: 661
Living next to the Skagihomaguamish I started re-learning the river as soon as the flood waters receded. I have been on almost every stretch of water from Marblemount to the forks and from Darrington to the mouth more then a few times. I have learned where the new runs are, where the old ones are not and where even older ones are again. I can tell you where to run your sled, drift boat, pontoon boat and where you should not. I have spent hours on classic runs without a take and a few moments in places a steehead should not be. Where have I had most of my takes? In those places a steelhead should not be. I am not complaining. I am puzzeled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #10  
Old 04-12-2004, 10:43 PM
wet fly wet fly is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Stilly
Posts: 134
Your problem is

Kerry, Your problem is you have been where the fish should not be when they are there. You have been where the steelhead should be when they are not there. Simple as that. Jerry
__________________
wet fly
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #11  
Old 04-13-2004, 12:15 AM
Riveraddict Riveraddict is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: steelhead country
Posts: 147
Different lies

It's been a real weird Spring so far...
- 85+% of "holding water" on the Sauk is sanded in. There are darned few "clean" areas of rock.
- Sauk bar looks better than it has in over 10 years, but isn't producing as good as it looks.
- steelhead takes for the past couple of weeks have been quite non-aggressive in nature.
- steelhead hooked in the last couple of weeks have not fought well.
- the proportion of bright to dark steelhead landed for the last couple of weeks has been unusually high on the bright side of the scale.

My take for what it's worth, just theory, mind you. Fish are running late this year (unusual # of bright to dark), and are therefore "charging hard" up the river (tentative takes/lethargic fights - ruled out temp as a cause, the Sauk has been up to 50 degrees on some days already). The "charging" means that the fish are taking less time to hold, which makes them less susceptible to being caught on the fly. I also do not think that we have any real substantial pushes of fish moving through, just small, sporadic bursts. "Catching" this year seems to really hinge, more so than usual, to being in the particular run that a fish or two has chosen to hold in for a short time, and not being in the 25 other holding spots that look good but are barren. It all boils down to the fact that not enough fish are moving through to "fill up" a bunch of runs like back in the "good old days".
__________________
Riveraddict
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #12  
Old 04-13-2004, 10:18 AM
Riveraddict Riveraddict is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: steelhead country
Posts: 147
Different lies

Any hooow,
To answer the question... the steelhead that I have hit in the last couple of weeks have been in "standard" steelhead water. What has been a bit unusual is that very few of the fish have taken the fly on the "inside" or towards the latter part of the swing. I think that this points back towards the "nonaggressive mood" that the fish seem to be in lately - they are not willing to "track" a fly very far right now, and the fish that are being caught happen to be the ones where you get a bit lucky and happen to put the fly directly in their face and therefore the fish does not have to move hardly at all to take the fly. The takes for me recently have been mere "stoppings" of the fly, or just "ticks", both indicators of fish not moving far from their lies to take the fly. Disappointingly lacking are the "strong grabs", and "incrementally increasing two ton weight" type takes, which are the "usual" anticipated takes of our April fishery, and indicative of a fish that has moved a significant distance to take.
I thought at first that water temperature was the cause of this phenomona, but the Skagit has been reaching upper 40's in the afternoons, and the Sauk has been even higher. These are temps that should be inducing high states of activity in the fish, with resulting aggressive grabs. But, the fish that happen to be passing through lately, seem to be in a very focused state of getting from point A to B with very little and brief "lingering" in between. I have seen this same circumstance occur up on the Skeena systems, where physical evidence of the presence of fish is much more evident (active rolling and porpoising). I have stood in runs full of obviously moving fish (constant sightings of rolling fish occuring consistently every couple of minutes throughout the entire day), and had takes on the fly only occasionally. The few takes that did occur were not very aggressive in nature. Also, the majority of fish hooked under these circumstances did not "rip it up" during the fight, seeming "asleep" or "in a trance" when hooked. These conditions always occured when the fish were running "late", and that appears to be what is happening so far this April on the Skagit/Sauk. Of course, we are also dealing with a low return this year also.
__________________
Riveraddict
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #13  
Old 04-14-2004, 08:13 PM
beau purvis beau purvis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: B.C. ,Wa. ,Ore.
Posts: 311
Send a message via AIM to beau purvis
lies

Interesting observations RA. I could take those same comments and aply them to the Dean last summer.I was there all summer. the water levels were abnormaly low all summer, except for a couple of bumps.There were major riverbed changes from prior fall floods.The runs were down. In particular,we noticed the fish seemed to burst through the section we were fishing and were disapointing inn terms of not displaying the traditional robust fighting qaulity of Dean river fish.We also were constantly thinking they were late,until we ran out of season.Never heard of a fish without lice below the canyon until mid august.Definitely no lingering. only places they seemed to hold were at obstructions caused by low water{remarko reef]. I have heard really poor reports from the Gold!Beau
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #14  
Old 04-16-2004, 11:24 AM
Robert Robert is offline
Decent Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The chrome triangle - Skagit, Stilly, Sauk
Posts: 32
Hmmmm

I'm wondering if the reports of lethargic fights and steelhead holding in slower water, especially on the Skagit and Sauk could be due to the inreased level of suspended solids still in the river. This could be affecting the ability to recieve oxygen through the gills. It would be expected that the suspended material would drop out in slower water and the fish may be able to find more oxygen in these lies.

Just a thought.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #15  
Old 04-16-2004, 11:24 AM
Sharp Steelie Sharp Steelie is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Washougal, East Fork Lewis
Posts: 119
This is a really interesting thread. Tried the Kalama a few
times this winter/spring and have yet to see a single
Steelhead in it. Found fish in the Toutle system just to the
North and the Lewis system just to the South. Concure with
the winter runs seeming lethargic this year. Had landed
a small Steelie on the SF Toutle that in my opinion fought
like a Walleye! In the same stretch of water hooked into a
larger sucker that actually put up a better fight than the
Steelie. That particular small Steelhead wasn't even much
of a challenge - completely opposite of summer runs from
last year!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Fly Fishing Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
headed to CT with Grandkids - any tips on school lies around maybe Groton? fliboy Stripers and Coastal Gamefish 0 10-15-2011 06:03 AM
Flies, Flies all lies jamie Stripers and Coastal Gamefish 19 08-17-2005 01:45 PM
5/31 S.E. Cape Cod Wade, Flies and LIES (he-he) RandyJones Stripers and Coastal Gamefish 0 05-31-2002 06:12 PM
Steelie Lies #1 juro Pacific Northwest Sea Run Forum 1 01-05-2001 01:08 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:58 AM.



Copyright Flyfishingforum.com (All Rights Reserved)