Fly Fishing Forum - Reply to Topic
Lines, Loops and Leaders Line / Leader Recipes, Loops, Splices, etc.

Thread: What Do You Think Of the New Spey Line Standards? Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Fly Fishing Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options
Rate Thread
If you like, you can add a score for this thread.

Topic Review (Newest First)
09-28-2004 01:17 PM
juro Thanks Sean, JD -

Unfortunately this is not conducive to "consistency" for lines with varying lengths over 80' like the ones I pointed out.

Therefore there is room for some further clarification in this area of the proposed standard in my opinion.

However the rest of the definition is nothing short of a Godsend.

.02
09-28-2004 12:49 PM
JDJones
Mind reading

Hey Juro,
What makes you think I am any better at mind reading than you?
I just know several of us have noticed the typo. I think Sean has a handle on it.
09-28-2004 12:45 PM
sean The way I understand it:

Long bellies are measured as any line over 70' with the grain measurement taken at 80' if they are over 80'.
09-28-2004 12:19 PM
juro In case it did not come thru in my post, "ecstatic" would be a proper word to describe how I feel about this standardization. Consistency is absolutely important, couldn't agree more.

I will drop Bruce Richards an email directly. Any excuse I can come up with to correspond with him is a good excuse, his insights into casting have been among the most influential to me in my study of flingin' a line. His analysis of casting and the way he describes it was like a revelation and has been a major influence to me. I highly recommend reading anything and everything he writes on the topic of casting.

However my point was to ask if anyone could clarify the definition of the extended belly lines, not to detract on it. Of course since the internet does not yet allow mind-reading, I should have said so specifically

So JD, you noticed the typo earlier. Until we master this mind-reading thing can you share what you found out about the long belly situation? (the point of my question)
09-28-2004 12:09 PM
JDJones
Typo

Quote:
Originally Posted by juro
Typo?

The listing mentioned long belly line head length to be 60-70 and a grain measurement to be 85'.

This is clearly a typo, but can I assume long belly means 75-85ft head? (split the difference theme of other ratings)

If so, where does this put the Grandspey and XLT?

Am I the only one to see this or did I miss something here?
You are not alone in noticing the typo.

And as to where the XLT & Grand Spey fit in, the important thing I think, is consistancy.
I applaud everyone who had even a minute part in bringing this about.
It may not be the perfect answer, but at least they are trying. And it is a big step in the right direction.
09-28-2004 11:38 AM
juro Typo?

The listing mentioned long belly line head length to be 60-70 and a grain measurement to be 85'.

This is clearly a typo, but can I assume long belly means 75-85ft head? (split the difference theme of other ratings)

If so, where does this put the Grandspey and XLT?

Am I the only one to see this or did I miss something here?
09-28-2004 10:52 AM
loophitech Thank you Scientific Anglers for stepping up to the plate and all other parties involved. I like the "blind bowling" analogy.

Vinnie
09-22-2004 10:03 PM
Skilly
new standards

Its a great step in the right direction.

No more blind bowling??? I hope.

Skilly
09-22-2004 08:30 PM
Greg Pavlov I had hoped that the spey world would consider changing the basic line class
designations, either by adding a letter (such as "6S") or doubling the numbers
(suchas "66"). It is not clear at times now what a rod or a line is intended to
be. And as two-handed overhead casting takes root, this will become more difficult to discern.
09-22-2004 02:35 PM
Smolt
What Do You Think Of the New Spey Line Standards?

Take a look at the article appearing at:

http://www.flyfisherman.com/spey/speystandards/

What do you think?

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 PM.



Copyright Flyfishingforum.com (All Rights Reserved)