Fly Fishing Forum - Reply to Topic
Lines, Loops and Leaders Line / Leader Recipes, Loops, Splices, etc.

Thread: George Harvey Dry Fly knot - Why not for wet flies? Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Fly Fishing Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options
Rate Thread
If you like, you can add a score for this thread.

Topic Review (Newest First)
11-17-2005 09:04 PM
chromedome Since starting this thread I've looked further into using this knot for wets. I find that unlike the improved turle, as the tippet comes off the knot into the eye, it does so at an angle. Thus the tippet doesn't come straight thru the eye and you can see this by vertically dangliing the fly. The fly then cants slightly to one side or another whereas with the turle, the fly is perfectly in line with the tippet. How much difference this makes I don't know but can imagine there might be spinning of the fly during the swing. I can see where that might even be a good thing with a fly like a wooly bugger but all in all the canting effect now has me turned off to this knot, at least for wets. I still think its original intent, for use in dry flies, is just another of the many great innovations by one of our heroes, George Harvey.
11-12-2005 08:50 PM
flytyer Since it holds the shank behind the eye like a Double Turle, it should work just fine with wet flies. I suspect the biggest reason you haven't found anyone talking about using it with wet flies is because Harvey is a trout fisherman and trout fisherman nearly to a man use a loop knot of some sort like the Duncan Loop or a clinch knot of some sort to attach wet flies or streamers to a leader.

I'd say use it if you wish because it is certainly a strong enough knot, pulls up behind the eye, and is pretty fast and easy to tie.
11-11-2005 04:53 PM
chromedome
George Harvey Dry Fly knot - Why not for wet flies?

I mainly fish steelhead and do a lot of swinging with a wet fly. I'm intrigued by knots and have done a lot of playing around with different knots. Before coming across the Harvey knot it seemed to me that the improved turle knot gave the best solution to being sure the wet fly rides straight off the leader. Lately, however, I have replaced the turle with the Harvey knot since it is easier to tie and like the turle knot, the knot is formed inside the eye. I have heard it is stronger than the turle knot. For a time, all seemed well. But then I began to think that maybe there is something about the Harvey knot that makes it less suitable for wet fly swinging than the turle knot. Something just doesn't seem right. For one thing, upon further internet digging, I can't come up with a single commentary that implies this knot is suitable for more than dry flies. I'd be curious about what experience others may have had using the Harvey knot for wet flies.

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:51 PM.



Copyright Flyfishingforum.com (All Rights Reserved)