Fly Fishing Forum - Reply to Topic
The Quintessential Trout Trout angling is the core of flyfishing worldwide.

Thread: Native vs. Non-native Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Fly Fishing Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options
Rate Thread
If you like, you can add a score for this thread.

Topic Review (Newest First)
11-30-2000 04:23 PM
juro
RE:Native vs. Non-native

Luis -

As usual a thought out and interesting discussion. I will definitely get the issue and read the article.

One preliminary thought before I read it - with all due respect to Schullery a native species can not be "restored", only preserved.

stay warm,

Juro
11-30-2000 12:18 PM
trutta
Native vs. Non-native

Considering the subject of native vs non-native species we discussed recently, I would encourage all of you to get a hold of the Jan/Feb 2001 issue of Fly Rod & Reel and read Paul Schullery's piece titled "Because They Belong There". Rather than just looking at it from the point of view of an angler's changing sensibilities and his own "zealotry" as he describes it, Schullery has pulled back to try and grasp the big picture with regards to this hot issue. He weighs the views of other non-angling groups who tend to coincide with our views of restoring native species but likely, for entirely different reasons. He argues that understanding what is behind this tide of changes in people's sentiments is the key to finding out what's in it for us as fly fishers. A well thought out and well written piece, something we don't see all that often in fly fishing mags theses days.

This whole issue reminds me of a debate that raged on in the Adirondacks a while back. The NY Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) decided to re-introduce "Heritage" strain brook trout to parts of its native Adirondack range. In order to do so, the lakes targeted for re-introduction were first treated with rotenone to eliminate "undersirable" species which could possibly be a hinderance to the viability of a sustainable population of brook trout. Some groups argued that this poisoning of the waters eliminated bi-valves and other organisms present in those lakes, and that it would be folly to do so considering that we do not really have any idea of what the impact of removing these species for good, would be, in the larger scheme of things.

Weighty issues to think about on this snowy day in Montreal.

Luis

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:30 PM.



Copyright Flyfishingforum.com (All Rights Reserved)